Chinese Association for the Study of Pain: Expert consensus on chronic postsurgical pain
| Autor: | Xian-Wei Zhang, Yi-Ming Liu, Yuan-Chang Xiong, Yan-Qing Liu, Yi Feng, Min Yan, Qing Liu, Yan Lv, Tao Song, Hong-Guang Bao, Ke Ma, Yi Jin, Jin-Feng Liu |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Interventional business.industry Prevention Psychological intervention MEDLINE General Medicine Evidence-based medicine Perioperative Treatment 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life (healthcare) Consistency (negotiation) Systematic review Expert Consensus 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Family medicine Medicine 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology business Chronic postsurgical pain Cohort study |
| Zdroj: | World Journal of Clinical Cases |
| ISSN: | 2307-8960 1989-2020 |
| Popis: | Chronic postsurgical pain is a common surgical complication that severely reduces a patient's quality of life. Many perioperative interventions and management strategies have been developed for reducing and managing chronic postsurgical pain. Under the leadership of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain, an editorial committee was formed for chronic postsurgical pain diagnosis and treatment by experts in relevant fields. The editorial committee composed the main content and framework of this consensus and established a working group. The working group conducted literature review (1989-2020) using key words such as "surgery", "post-surgical", "post-operative", "pain", "chronic", and "persistent" in different databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Only publications in the English language were included. The types of literature included systematic reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case reports. This consensus was written based on clinical practice combined with literature evidence. The first draft of the consensus was rigorously reviewed and edited by all the editorial committee experts before being finalized. The level of evidence was assessed by methodological experts based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The strength of recommendation was evaluated by all editorial committee experts, and the opinions of most experts were adopted as the final decision. The recommendation level "strong" generally refers to recommendations based on high-level evidence and consistency between clinical behavior and expected results. The recommendation level "weak" generally refers to the uncertainty between clinical behavior and expected results based on low-level evidence. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|