Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin therapy versus intravenous ceftazidime therapy for selected bacterial infections
| Autor: | Paula L. Gaut, William C. Carron, Richard D. Meyer, Wendell T. W. Ching |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1989 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Administration Oral Ceftazidime medicine.disease_cause Gastroenterology Ciprofloxacin Internal medicine Amphotericin B medicine Humans Drug Interactions Infusions Intravenous Adverse effect Aged Aged 80 and over Clinical Trials as Topic business.industry Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clindamycin Bacterial Infections General Medicine Middle Aged Surgery Concomitant Superinfection Female business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | The American Journal of Medicine. 87:S169-S175 |
| ISSN: | 0002-9343 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90051-x |
| Popis: | The efficacy and toxicity of sequential intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin therapy was compared with intravenously administered ceftazidime in a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded trial. Thirty-two patients (16 patients receiving ciprofloxacin and 16 patients receiving ceftazidime) with 38 infections caused by susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enteric gram-negative rods, Salmonella group B, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas cepacia, and Xanthomonas maltophilia at various sites were evaluable for determination of efficacy. Length of therapy varied from seven to 25 days. Concomitant antimicrobials included intravenously administered beta-lactams for gram-positive organisms, intravenous/oral metronidazole and clindamycin for anaerobes, and intravenous/local amphotericin B for Candida albicans. Intravenous administration of 200 mg ciprofloxacin every 12 hours to 11 patients produced peak serum levels between 1.15 and 3.12 micrograms/ml; trough levels ranged between 0.08 and 0.86 micrograms/ml. Overall response rates were similar for patients receiving ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime. Emergence of resistance was similar in both groups--one Enterobacter cloacae and two P. aeruginosa became resistant after ciprofloxacin therapy and two P. aeruginosa became resistant after ceftazidime therapy. The frequency of superinfection with a variety of organisms was also similar in both groups. Adverse events related to ciprofloxacin included transient pruritus at the infusion site and generalized rash leading to drug discontinuation (one patient each), and with ceftazidime adverse effects included pain at the site of infusion and the development of allergic interstitial nephritis (one patient each). Overall, intravenous/oral ciprofloxin therapy appears to be as safe and effective as intravenous ceftazidime therapy in the treatment of a variety of infections due to susceptible aerobic gram-negative organisms. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|