In assisted reproduction by IVF or ICSI, the rate at which embryos develop to the blastocyst stage is influenced by the fertilization method used: a split IVF/ICSI study
Autor: | B. E. Speyer, Paul Serhal, Matthew Gaunt, Srividya Seshadri, Suzanne Cawood, Carleen Heath, Helen M. K. O'Neill, Wael Saab |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Male Pregnancy Rate medicine.medical_treatment Embryo development Intracytoplasmic sperm injection 0302 clinical medicine Human fertilization Pregnancy Assisted Reproduction Technologies Genetics (clinical) reproductive and urinary physiology media_common 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology Embryo General Medicine Spermatozoa medicine.anatomical_structure IVF embryonic structures Sperm Motility Female Reproduction Live Birth Infertility Adult Reproductive Techniques Assisted media_common.quotation_subject Embryonic Development Fertilization in Vitro Biology ICSI Andrology 03 medical and health sciences Genetics medicine Humans Blastocyst Sperm Injections Intracytoplasmic In vitro fertilisation urogenital system medicine.disease Embryo Transfer Sperm 030104 developmental biology Reproductive Medicine Oocytes Developmental Biology |
Zdroj: | Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics |
ISSN: | 1573-7330 |
Popis: | Purpose To compare in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in regard to post-fertilization development and outcome with the purpose of ascertaining the most effective fertilization method for assisted reproduction. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 136 split IVF/ICSI cycles (where sibling oocytes are fertilized by two different methods using the same sperm sample). Results IVF-derived embryos developed to the blastocyst stage at a significantly faster rate than ICSI-derived embryos. There was no significant difference in fertilization or livebirth rates between the two fertilization methods. Conclusions For patients with sperm progressive motility ≥ 1.0 × 106/ml (who usually constitute the majority of patients), no significant difference between the two fertilization methods was found in regard to fertilization rate or livebirth rate. Remaining factors influencing choice between the two methods appear to be restricted to convenience, financial considerations and concern with regard to possible perpetuation of genetically linked infertility to future generations. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |