Polypropylene Mesh Predicts Mesh/Suture Exposure After Sacrocolpopexy Independent of Known Risk Factors: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
| Autor: | Paula J. Durst, Michael Heit |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Urology Polypropylenes Pelvic Organ Prolapse 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Postoperative Complications Suture (anatomy) Risk Factors medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Retrospective Studies 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine business.industry Suture Techniques Case-control study Obstetrics and Gynecology Retrospective cohort study Perioperative Odds ratio Surgical Mesh Control subjects Confidence interval Surgery Polypropylene mesh Logistic Models Case-Control Studies Female business |
| Zdroj: | Female pelvic medicinereconstructive surgery. 24(5) |
| ISSN: | 2154-4212 |
| Popis: | Objective(s) The aim of this study was to determine if ultralightweight polypropylene mesh reduced the risk of mesh/suture exposure after sacrocolpopexy compared with heavier-weighted polypropylene. Methods Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to interpret data from 133 cases and 261 control subjects to evaluate independent predictors of mesh/suture exposure after sacrocolpopexy from 2003 to 2013. Results Multivariate logistic regression revealed that prior surgery for incontinence (odds ratio [OR], 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-6.96), porcine acellular cross-linked collagen matrix with medium-weight polypropylene mesh (OR, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.70-14.42), other polypropylene mesh (OR, 6.73; 95% CI, 1.12-40.63), nonabsorbable braided suture for vaginal mesh attachment (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 1.53-15.37), and immediate perioperative complications (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.53-13.37) were independent risk factors for mesh/suture exposure. After multivariate analysis, ultralightweight polypropylene mesh was no longer associated with decreased rates of mesh/suture exposure after controlling for known risk factors identified during bivariate analysis (P = 0.423). Conclusions Both mesh choice and suture selection remained independent predictors of mesh/suture exposure, with heavier meshes increasing and monofilament suture decreasing rates of mesh/suture exposure. Based on this study, surgeons may consider use of delayed-absorbable, monofilament suture over nonabsorbable braided suture for attachment of vaginal mesh to reduce the risk of mesh/suture exposure when using mesh. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|