Survey of retail milk composition as affected by label claims regarding farm-management practices
| Autor: | Robin L. Staub, John L. Vicini, Penny M. Kris-Etherton, Terry D. Etherton, Daniel A. Goldstein, Matthew C. Lucy, Joan Ballam, Roger Cady, Steven Denham, M.F. McGrath |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2007 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Agricultural management Professional practice Cell Count Bacterial counts fluids and secretions Animal science Food Labeling Internal medicine Medicine Animals Humans Bovine somatotropin Statistical analysis Organic milk Nutrition and Dietetics business.industry food and beverages Survey research Consumer Behavior Milk Proteins United States Food labeling Anti-Bacterial Agents Dairying Endocrinology Milk Consumer Product Safety Growth Hormone Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Cattle Female business Nutritive Value Food Science |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 108(7) |
| ISSN: | 0002-8223 |
| Popis: | A trend in food labeling is to make claims related to agricultural management, and this is occurring with dairy labels. A survey study was conducted to compare retail milk for quality (antibiotics and bacterial counts), nutritional value (fat, protein, and solids-not-fat), and hormonal composition (somatotropin, insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1], estradiol, and progesterone) as affected by three label claims related to dairy-cow management: conventional, recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST)-free (processor-certified not from cows supplemented with rbST), or organic (follows US Department of Agriculture organic practices). Retail milk samples (n=334) from 48 states were collected. Based on a statistical analysis that reflected the sampling schema and distributions appropriate to the various response variables, minor differences were observed for conventional, rbST-free, and organic milk labels. Conventionally labeled milk had the lowest (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect