Bias in predicted and remembered emotion
| Autor: | Linda J. Levine, Melissa M. Karnaze, Steven J. Carlson, Heather C. Lench |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Change over time
1.2 Psychological and socioeconomic processes Cognitive Neuroscience Subject (philosophy) Constructive 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences Behavioral Neuroscience 0302 clinical medicine Underpinning research Clinical Research ComputerApplications_MISCELLANEOUS Behavioral and Social Science Psychology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Episodic memory 05 social sciences Cognition Brain Disorders Psychiatry and Mental health Mental Health Social psychology Mind and Body 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Strengths and weaknesses |
| Zdroj: | Levine, LJ; Lench, HC; Karnaze, MM; & Carlson, SJ. (2018). Bias in predicted and remembered emotion. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.10.008. UC Irvine: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0643z142 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.10.008. |
| Popis: | © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Predicting and remembering emotion both rely on the episodic memory system which is constructive and subject to bias. In keeping with the common cognitive processes underlying prospection and retrospection, people show similar strengths and weaknesses when they predict how they will feel in the future and remember how they felt in the past. Recent findings reveal that people predict and remember the intensity of emotion more accurately than their overall or general emotional response, and whether emotion is overestimated or underestimated depends on how people's attention to, and appraisals about, events change over time. People's phenomenological experience differs markedly when they are predicting versus remembering emotion, however. Phenomenological cues, such as intensity and autonoetic experience, make predicted emotion a more compelling guide for decisions, even when inaccurate. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|