Short-term outcome of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus perioperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: a propensity score-matched analysis
Autor: | Angela Ernst, Lars Schiffmann, Wolfgang Schröder, Christiane J. Bruns, Patrick Sven Plum, Marc Bludau, Alexander Damanakis, Hans F. Fuchs, Hakan Alakus, Rabi R Datta, Arnulf H. Hölscher, Lisa Buschmann, Seung-Hun Chon, Thomas Zander |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty Esophageal Neoplasms medicine.medical_treatment Adenocarcinoma Gastroenterology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Internal medicine medicine Clinical endpoint Humans Esophagus Propensity Score Survival rate Retrospective Studies Chemotherapy Gastric emptying business.industry Multimodal therapy Chemoradiotherapy General Medicine medicine.disease Neoadjuvant Therapy Esophagectomy Treatment Outcome medicine.anatomical_structure Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Propensity score matching 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Esophagogastric Junction business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 148:1223-1234 |
ISSN: | 1432-1335 0171-5216 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00432-021-03720-5 |
Popis: | Background Patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma benefit from multimodal therapy concepts including neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), respectively, perioperative chemotherapy (pCT). However, it remains unclear which treatment is superior concerning postoperative morbidity. Methods In this study, we compared the postsurgical survival (30-day/90-day/1-year mortality) (primary endpoint), treatment response, and surgical complications (secondary endpoints) of patients who either received nCRT (CROSS protocol) or pCT (FLOT protocol) due to esophageal/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Between January 2013 and December 2017, 873 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in our high-volume center. 339 patients received nCRT and 97 underwent pCT. After 1:1 propensity score matching (matching criteria: sex, age, BMI, ASA score, and Charlson score), 97 patients per subgroup were included for analysis. Results After matching, tumor response (ypT/ypN) did not differ significantly between nCRT and pCT (p = 0.118, respectively, p = 0.174). Residual nodal metastasis occurred more often after pCT (p = 0.001). Postsurgical mortality was comparable within both groups. No patient died within 30 or 90 days after surgery while the 1-year survival rate was 72.2% for nCRT and 68.0% for pCT (p = 0.47). Only grade 3a complications according to Clavien–Dindo were increased after pCT (p = 0.04). There was a trend towards a higher rate of pylorospasm within the pCT group (nCRT: 23.7% versus pCT: 37.1%) (p = 0.061). Multivariate analysis identified pCT, younger age, and Charlson score as independent variables for pylorospasm. Conclusion Both nCRT and pCT are safe and efficient within the multimodal treatment of esophageal/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We did not observe differences in postoperative morbidity. However, functional aspects such as gastric emptying might be more frequent after pCT. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |