Reliability of Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale for the Assessment of Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Autor: | César A. Pastor-Asurza, Karen Vega, Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald, Katiuska Zúñiga, Cristina Reátegui-Sokolova, Manuel F. Ugarte-Gil, Rocío V. Gamboa-Cárdenas, Armando Calvo, Cynthia Aranow, Zoila Rodriguez Bellido, Francisco Zevallos, Risto Perich-Campos, Graciela S. Alarcón |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Visual Analog Scale Visual analogue scale patient-reported outcome Severity of Illness Index Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine systemic lupus erythematosus Rheumatology Rating scale Internal medicine Numeric Rating Scale Humans Lupus Erythematosus Systemic Medicine Disease activity 030212 general & internal medicine purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.17 [https] Reliability (statistics) Pain Measurement 030203 arthritis & rheumatology Systemic lupus erythematosus business.industry Reproducibility of Results medicine.disease Cross-Sectional Studies Mann–Whitney U test business |
Zdroj: | JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 26:S170-S173 |
ISSN: | 1536-7355 1076-1608 |
DOI: | 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001274 |
Popis: | OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of SLE patients' disease activity measurements. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted (August 2016-December 2017) at 2 main public Peruvian hospitals, 1 with a comprehensive lupus care program. Patients assessed their disease activity with a visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) or a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-4) before and after their physician's (MD's) assessment. Demographic and disease-related characteristics were recorded. Reliability of patients' disease activity before and after MD's assessment was determined using Spearman rank correlation. Factors possibly associated with this variability were examined with Spearman rank correlation and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Two hundred forty, mostly Mestizo, SLE patients were included; mean (SD) age and disease duration (diagnosis) were 34.9 (12.9) years and 10.1 (7.0) years, respectively. The Mexican version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index was 1.9 (2.7), and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index was 1.2 (1.5). The correlations between NRS and VAS before and after the MD's assessment were ρ = 0.839; p < 0.001; and ρ = 0.872; p < 0.001, respectively. Visual analog scale and NRS were higher before than after the MD's assessment (VAS 29.3 [26.5] and 26.5 [24.9], p = 0.052; and NRS (1.5 [1.2] and 1.3 [1.1], p = 0.003); only the comprehensive program explained this variability (p = 0.043). The reliability of VAS and NRS was ρ = 0.917 and ρ = 0.861, p < 0.001, before and after for the comprehensive program and ρ = 0.710 and ρ = 0.785, p < 0.001, for before and after for the regular program. CONCLUSIONS: Both VAS an NRS are highly reliable. Patients scored higher before than after their physicians' assessment but that these differences were smaller for the patients in the comprehensive care program than in the regular one. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |