Prognostic Value of Resection of Primary Tumor in Patients with Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of Two Randomized Studies and a Review of the Literature
Autor: | Aart van Bochove, Linda Mol, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Steven Teerenstra, Geert-Jan Creemers, Olaf Loosveld, Sabine Venderbosch, Margot E T Tesselaar, Miriam Koopman, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Harm Sinnige |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Oncology medicine.medical_specialty Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Colorectal cancer Quality of nursing and allied health care [NCEBP 6] Asymptomatic Quality of Care [ONCOL 4] Resection Original Article–Colorectal Cancer Translational research [ONCOL 3] Surgical oncology Internal medicine medicine Retrospective analysis Humans In patient Survival rate Aged Neoplasm Staging Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over Cetuximab business.industry Retrospective cohort study Middle Aged Prognosis medicine.disease Primary tumor digestive system diseases Survival Rate Clinical trial Review Literature as Topic Clinical Trials Phase III as Topic Evaluation of complex medical interventions [NCEBP 2] Female Surgery medicine.symptom Colorectal Neoplasms business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Annals of Surgical Oncology, 18, 3252-60 Annals of Surgical Oncology, 18, 12, pp. 3252-60 |
ISSN: | 0976-6952 0975-7651 1068-9265 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13193-012-0157-z |
Popis: | Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with an asymptomatic primary tumor, there is no consensus on the indication for resection of the primary tumor. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with or without resection of the primary tumor treated in the phase III CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies. A review of the literature was performed. RESULTS: In the CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies, 258 and 289 patients had undergone a primary tumor resection and 141 and 159 patients had not, respectively. In the CAIRO study, a significantly better median overall survival and progression-free survival was observed for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 16.7 vs. 11.4 months [P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61], and 6.7 vs. 5.9 months (P = 0.004; HR 0.74), respectively. In the CAIRO2 study, median overall survival and progression-free survival were also significantly better for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 20.7 vs. 13.4 months (P < 0.0001; HR 0.65) and 10.5 vs. 7.8 months (P = 0.014; HR 0.78), respectively. These differences remained significant in multivariate analyses. Our review identified 22 nonrandomized studies, most of which showed improved survival for mCRC patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Our results as well as data from literature indicate that resection of the primary tumor is a prognostic factor for survival in stage IV CRC patients. The potential bias of these results warrants prospective studies on the value of resection of primary tumor in this setting; such studies are currently being planned. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |