Does IMRT increase the peripheral radiation dose? A comparison of treatment plans 2000 and 2010
| Autor: | Tilo Wiezorek, Regina Eichner, Henning Salz |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_treatment Biophysics Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Rectum Radiation Dosage Radiation Protection otorhinolaryngologic diseases Humans Scattering Radiation Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Lymphatic Irradiation Radiological and Ultrasound Technology Brain Neoplasms Phantoms Imaging Rectal Neoplasms business.industry Radiotherapy Planning Computer-Assisted Radiation dose Radiotherapy Dosage Standard technique Peripheral Radiation therapy Leukemia Myeloid Acute Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms medicine.anatomical_structure Spinal Cord Child Preschool Total dose Female Dose reduction Anthropomorphic phantom Radiotherapy Intensity-Modulated Cranial Irradiation Radiotherapy Conformal business Nuclear medicine Software |
| Zdroj: | Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 22:6-12 |
| ISSN: | 0939-3889 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.zemedi.2011.03.004 |
| Popis: | It has been reported in several papers and textbooks that IMRT treatments increase the peripheral dose in comparison with non-IMRT fields. But in clinical practice not only open fields have been used in the pre-IMRT era, but also fields with physical wedges or composed fields. The aim of this work is to test the hypothesis of increased peripheral dose when IMRT is used compared to standard conformal radiotherapy. Furthermore, the importance of the measured dose differences in clinical practice is discussed and compared with other new technologies for the cases where an increase of the peripheral dose was observed. For cancers of the head and neck, the cervix, the rectum and for the brain irradiation due to acute leukaemia, one to four plans have been calculated with IMRT or conformal standard technique (non-IMRT). In an anthropomorphic phantom the dose at a distance of 30 cm in cranio-caudal direction from the target edge was measured with TLDs using a linear accelerator Oncor ® (Siemens) for both techniques. IMRT was performed using step-and-shoot technique (7 to 11 beams), non-IMRT plans with different techniques. The results depended on the site of irradiation. For head and neck cancers IMRT resulted in an increase of 0.05 - 0.09% of the prescribed total dose (Dptv) or 40 - 70 mGy (Dptv = 65 Gy), compared to non-IMRT technique without wedges or a decrease of 0.16% (approx. 100 mGy) of the prescribed total dose compared to non-IMRT techniques with wedges. For the cervical cancer IMRT resulted in an increased dose in the periphery (+ 0.07% - 0.15% of Dptv or 30 - 70 mGy at Dptv = 45 Gy), for the rectal cancer in a dose reduction (0.21 - 0.26% of Dptv or 100 - 130 mGy at Dptv = 50 Gy) and for the brain irradiation in an increase dose (+ 0.05% of Dptv = 18 Gy or 9 mSv). In summary IMRT does not uniformly cause increased radiation dose in the periphery in the model used. It can be stated that these dose values are smaller than reported in earlier papers. Slightly increased additional radiation dose in the periphery is likely to be counterbalanced by the much higher conformity and the often better homogeneity. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect