A systematic review and meta-analysis of the criterion validity of nutrition assessment tools for diagnosing protein-energy malnutrition in the older community setting (the MACRo study)
Autor: | Jaimon T Kelly, Dana L. Craven, Elisabeth Isenring, Skye Marshall |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Predictive validity Gerontology Aging Protein–energy malnutrition MEDLINE Concurrent validity Validity Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Protein-Energy Malnutrition 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Risk Factors medicine Criterion validity Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Aged Aged 80 and over 030109 nutrition & dietetics Nutrition and Dietetics business.industry Reproducibility of Results Physical Functional Performance medicine.disease Malnutrition Nutrition Assessment Systematic review Meta-analysis Independent Living business |
Zdroj: | Clinical Nutrition. 37:1902-1912 |
ISSN: | 0261-5614 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.022 |
Popis: | Summary Background & aims Malnutrition is a significant barrier to healthy and independent ageing in older adults who live in their own homes, and accurate diagnosis is a key step in managing the condition. However, there has not been sufficient systematic review or pooling of existing data regarding malnutrition diagnosis in the geriatric community setting. The current paper was conducted as part of the MACRo (Malnutrition in the Ageing Community Review) Study and seeks to determine the criterion (concurrent and predictive) validity and reliability of nutrition assessment tools in making a diagnosis of protein-energy malnutrition in the general older adult community. Methods A systematic literature review was undertaken using six electronic databases in September 2016. Studies in any language were included which measured malnutrition via a nutrition assessment tool in adults ≥65 years living in their own homes. Data relating to the predictive validity of tools were analysed via meta-analyses. GRADE was used to evaluate the body of evidence. Results There were 6412 records identified, of which 104 potentially eligible records were screened via full text. Eight papers were included; two which evaluated the concurrent validity of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and six which evaluated the predictive validity of the MNA. The quality of the body of evidence for the concurrent validity of both the MNA and SGA was very low. The quality of the body of evidence for the predictive validity of the MNA in detecting risk of death was moderate (RR: 1.92 [95% CI: 1.55–2.39]; P Conclusions Due to the small number of studies identified and no evaluation of the predictive validity of tools other than the MNA, there is insufficient evidence to recommend a particular nutrition assessment tool for diagnosing PEM in older adults in the community. High quality diagnostic accuracy studies are needed for all nutrition assessment tools used in older community samples, including measuring of health outcomes subsequent to nutrition assessment by the SGA and PG-SGA. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |