Application of computerised image analysis to monitoring endodontic therapy: reproducibility and comparison with visual assessment
Autor: | E Kerosuo, D Orstavik |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 1997 |
Předmět: |
Endodontic therapy
Bone density Radiography Dentistry Sensitivity and Specificity 01 natural sciences 010104 statistics & probability 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Bone Density Predictive Value of Tests Radiography Dental medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging 0101 mathematics General Dentistry Observer Variation Periodontitis Reproducibility business.industry Periapical Diseases Reproducibility of Results 030206 dentistry General Medicine Gold standard (test) medicine.disease Otorhinolaryngology Evaluation Studies as Topic Predictive value of tests Radiographic Image Interpretation Computer-Assisted business Kappa |
Zdroj: | Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 26:79-84 |
ISSN: | 1476-542X 0250-832X |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600207 |
Popis: | To evaluate the intra- and interexaminer reproducibility of computerised image analysis for the assessment of periapical bone changes based on gray value ratio when compared with a visual method.353 radiographs obtained in a clinical endodontic study were analysed. Densitometric analyses were used to evaluate changes in bone density following endodontic treatment. The diseased area of apical periodontitis' (AP) and 'normal bone area' (AN) were defined and ratios of the gray values (AP/AN) were calculated for each radiograph. Periapical index (PAI) was used as the 'gold standard'. Correlation coefficient (r), Kappa (kappa), and t-test for matched pairs were used for the statistics.The method proyed to be reproducible for intra-examiner re-examinations, r ranging from 0.7 to 0.84 (P0.01). Kappa showed fair to good agreement for data divided into four or three categories (kappa = 0.25-0.64). Dichotomised data showed fair to moderate agreement (kappa = 0.33-0.4) when the whole process was repeated, and good to very good agreement (kappa = 0.64-0.85) for the delineation process alone. The interexaminer comparisons showed fair to moderate agreement (kappa = 0.3-0.49). Comparison with PAI showed a 61% sensitivity and 79% specificity in detecting severe lesions (corresponding PAI scores 4 and 5) and the kappa value of 0.40 showed moderate agreement. The image analysis was sensitive enough to detect healing one month after treatment in a group of teeth with substantial lesions (P0.05).The computerised image analysis system seems to be an appropriate tool to detect the periapical bone changes in dental radiographs at a group level. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |