Definitive Radiation Therapy and Survival in Clinically Node-Positive Prostate Cancer

Autor: Andrew Karim Kader, Jason A. Efstathiou, James D. Murphy, Rana R. McKay, Alex K. Bryant, Brent S. Rose, John P. Einck, Christopher J. Kane, Arno J. Mundt, Loren K. Mell
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Oncology
Male
Cancer Research
Aging
Time Factors
Databases
Factual

medicine.medical_treatment
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Androgen deprivation therapy
Cohort Studies
Prostate cancer
0302 clinical medicine
Prostate
Medicine
Neoplasm Metastasis
Veterans
Cancer
Radiation
Prostate Cancer
Incidence
Hazard ratio
Middle Aged
Hospitals
Other Physical Sciences
medicine.anatomical_structure
Treatment Outcome
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Lymphatic Metastasis
Patient Safety
Urologic Diseases
medicine.medical_specialty
Hospitals
Veterans

Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Disease-Free Survival
03 medical and health sciences
Databases
Statistical significance
Internal medicine
Humans
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Veterans Affairs
Factual
Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
business.industry
Proportional hazards model
Prostatic Neoplasms
Androgen Antagonists
Prostate-Specific Antigen
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
Radiation therapy
Good Health and Well Being
Multivariate Analysis
Lymph Nodes
business
Zdroj: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, vol 101, iss 5
Bryant, AK; Kader, AK; McKay, RR; Einck, JP; Mell, LK; Mundt, AJ; et al.(2018). Definitive Radiation Therapy and Survival in Clinically Node-Positive Prostate Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 101(5), 1188-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.023. UC San Diego: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3v9686cs
ISSN: 1879-355X
Popis: 168 Background: The survival benefit of combined radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to ADT alone for clinically lymph node-positive prostate cancer remains controversial. Methods: We identified clinically node-positive, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 2000-2015 and treated with ADT (n = 450) or ADT/RT (n = 198) from a national Veterans Affairs database. We compared prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) between treatment groups using multivariable Cox regression, controlling for potential confounders. All tests of statistical significance were two sided. Results: Compared to ADT alone, ADT/RT was associated with improved ACM (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76, p < 0.001) and PCSM overall (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.97, p = 0.03). We noted a significant interaction between ADT/RT and pre-treatment PSA for PCSM (p for interaction = 0.005) and ACM (p for interaction < 0.001). ADT/RT was associated with improved PCSM among patients with PSA less than (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.78, p = 0.004) but not greater than the median of 26 ng/mL (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.60-1.71, p = 0.96). ADT/RT was also associated with improved ACM among patients with PSA less than (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.57, p < 0.001) but not greater than the median (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.60-1.38, p = 0.66). Conclusions: Definitive treatment with ADT/RT is associated with improved ACM and PCSM among patients with clinically node-positive prostate cancer. The survival benefit of ADT/RT is only apparent among patients with lower baseline PSA. Patients with clinically node-positive disease appear to be a heterogeneous cohort, with a subset that may achieve long-term survival with combined radiation and androgen deprivation therapy.
Databáze: OpenAIRE