Stakeholders' perceptions of humanized birth practices and obstetric violence in Chile: A scoping review
| Autor: | Yoselyn Millón, Francisco Pantoja, Marcelo Arancibia, Michelle Campos, Luna Sánchez, Verónica Hidalgo, Ana María Silva, Jana Stojanova, Cristian Papuzinski |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
media_common.quotation_subject
Quality care lcsh:Medicine Resistance (psychoanalysis) 03 medical and health sciences Politics violence 0302 clinical medicine Public discussion Pregnancy Perception Childbirth Medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Chile parturition Qualitative Research midwifery media_common lcsh:R5-920 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine obstetrics business.industry lcsh:R General Medicine Public relations Delivery Obstetric Female Convergence (relationship) women Thematic analysis business lcsh:Medicine (General) |
| Zdroj: | Medwave, Vol 20, Iss 09, Pp e8047-e8047 (2020) |
| ISSN: | 0717-6384 |
| Popis: | Introduction Chile has an incipient policy regarding humanized birth practices. Obstetric violence is becoming an issue in the public discussion, as brought up by women. Despite this advancement, no initiatives were observed to overcome the conflict. Questions arise from the different points of view of the main stakeholders involved. These questions help identify strategies contributing to the development of health policies that consider influencing actors. Objectives To identify stakeholders' perceptions of humanized care in childbirth and obstetric violence. Methods We conducted a scoping review that included articles and analysis of texts reflecting the scientific communities' point of view. We included statements from governmental, social, professional, and political actors as expressed in institutional websites. Moreover, we performed a qualitative inductive, thematic content analysis. Results We included seventy documents. The scientific community is visualized as aligned with ministerial recommendations for personalized childbirth. Several researchers analyze the difficulties for its improvement due to the historical, socio-cultural, and economic construction of the predominantly biomedical model for birthing. Convergence is observed among the scientific community and other stakeholders in recognition of humanized birth benefits and the need to overcome institutional obstacles within the health sector. However, the progress of the proposed change is slow, and health professionals' resistance to address women's complaints towards obstetric violence and claim of quality care is observed. This discussion finds its reflection in a parliamentary discussion. Conclusions The stakeholders' analysis reflects areas of conflict and consensus, as well as the diverse interacting dimensions that hinder the advance of humanized care in childbirth. This broad analysis strategy contributes to identifying critical aspects to be addressed in the development of integral and effective health policies. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|