Clinical Comparison of Ibutilide and Propafenone for Converting Atrial Flutter
Autor: | Ji-Hong Guo, Ping Zhang, Hai-Cheng Zhang, Jian-ling Sun, Nan Zhang |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2005 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Bradycardia Tachycardia medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors medicine.medical_treatment Ibutilide Propafenone Antiarrhythmic agent Cardioversion Electrocardiography Double-Blind Method Internal medicine medicine Humans Pharmacology (medical) Prospective Studies cardiovascular diseases Infusions Intravenous Aged Pharmacology Sulfonamides Dose-Response Relationship Drug medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease Treatment Outcome Atrial Flutter Anesthesia cardiovascular system Cardiology Female medicine.symptom Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Atrial flutter medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. 19:57-64 |
ISSN: | 1573-7241 0920-3206 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10557-005-6898-y |
Popis: | Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ibutilide and propafenone for immediate treatment of atrial flutter. Methods: Forty patients with atrial flutter with an arrhythmia duration of three hours to 90 days were randomized to receive up to two 10-minute infusions of ibutilide (1 and 1 mg) or propafenone (70 and 70 mg) with a 10-minute interval. Results: Ibutilide was superior to propafenone for treating atrial flutter (90% vs. 30%, p < 0.01). The median conversion time in the ibutilide group was 11 min (the 25th and 75th percentile was 10 and 45 min), and the median conversion time in the propafenone group was 35 min (range 20–55 min). In all patients, the duration of arrhythmia before treatment was a predictor of arrhythmia termination, although this was more obvious in the group that received ibutilide. Conversion of atrial flutter by ibutilide was characterized mainly by increased cycle length variability. Bradycardia (2/20) and hypotension (4/20) were more common side effects with propafenone. Of 20 patients given ibutilide, 8 (40%) who developed monomorphic ventricular extrasystoles or repetitive atrial flutter with aberrant conduction tachycardia, no one required any specific treatment except for the interruption of ibutilide infusion. Conclusion: Ibutilide is highly effective for rapidly terminating atrial flutter. This new class III drug, under monitored conditions, is a potential alternative to currently available cardioversion options. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |