| Autor: |
Leonardo Ciocca, Mattia Maltauro, Valerio Cimini, Lorenzo Breschi, Angela Montanari, Laura Anderlucci, Roberto Meneghello |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Ciocca L., Maltauro M., Cimini V., Breschi L., Montanari A., Anderlucci L., Meneghello R. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Popis: |
PURPOSE. Digital technology has enabled improvements in the fitting accuracy of denture bases via milling techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness and precision of digital and analog techniques for manufacturing complete dentures (CDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty identical CDs were manufactured using different production protocols. Digital and analog technologies were compared using the reference geometric approach, and the Delta-error values of eight areas of interest (AOI) were calculated. For each AOI, a precise number of measurement points was selected according to sensitivity analyses to compare the Delta-error of trueness and precision between the original model and manufactured prosthesis. Three types of statistical analysis were performed: to calculate the intergroup cumulative difference among the three protocols, the intergroup among the AOIs, and the intragroup difference among AOIs. RESULTS. There was a statistically significant difference between the dentures made using the oversize process and injection molding process (P < .001), but no significant difference between the other two manufacturing methods (P = .1227). There was also a statistically significant difference between the dentures made using the monolithic process and the other two processes for all AOIs (P = .0061), but there was no significant difference between the other two processes (P = 1). Within each group, significant differences among the AOIs were observed. CONCLUSION. The monolithic process yielded better results, in terms of accuracy (trueness and precision), than the other groups, although all three processes led to dentures with Delta-error values well within the clinical tolerance limit. [J Adv Prosthodont 2023;15:22-32] |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
