The effectiveness of daily and alternate day oral iron supplementation in athletes with suboptimal iron status (part 2)
| Autor: | Alex Dreyer, Marc Sim, Rachel McCormick, Leanne Lester, Carmel Goodman, Brian Dawson, Peter Peeling |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Physiology 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine athlete health Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Training load Serum ferritin Dietary iron Nutrition and Dietetics biology Athletes business.industry supplementation strategy 030229 sport sciences General Medicine gastrointestinal side effects biology.organism_classification Gastrointestinal upset oral iron therapy Iron supplementation Iron status Hemoglobin business |
| Popis: | The authors compared the effectiveness of daily (DAY) versus alternate day (ALT) oral iron supplementation in athletes with suboptimal iron. Endurance-trained runners (nine males and 22 females), with serum ferritin (sFer) concentrations mass) was measured pre- and postintervention in a participant subset (n = 10). Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the effectiveness of the two strategies on sFer and Hbmass. There were no sFer treatment (p = .928) or interaction (p = .877) effects; however, sFer did increase (19.7 μg/L;p p masstreatment (p = .146) or interaction (p = .249) effects existed; however, a significant effect for sex indicated that Hbmasswas 140.85 g higher (p = .004) in males compared with females. Training load (p = .001) and dietary iron intake (p = .015) also affected Hbmass. Finally, there were six complaints of severe gastrointestinal side effects in DAY, but only one in ALT. In summary, both supplement strategies increased sFer in athletes with suboptimal iron status; however, the ALT approach was associated with lower incidence of gastrointestinal upset. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|