Evaluation of the utricular and saccular function using oVEMPs and cVEMPs in BPPV patients
Autor: | Liang Chen, Xi-cheng Song, Michael Chi Fai Tong, Yan Sun, Fa-ya Liang, Hui Xu, Jiun Fong Thong, Qing-quan Zhang |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo Time Factors Vestibular evoked myogenic potential Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) Audiology Severity of Illness Index 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Cervical/ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c/oVEMPs) Severity of illness medicine otorhinolaryngologic diseases Saccular Humans Original Research Article Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Prospective Studies Saccule and Utricle 030223 otorhinolaryngology Prospective cohort study Utricular Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials business.industry Healthy subjects Reproducibility of Results Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Middle Aged medicine.disease Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Otorhinolaryngology Surgery Female sense organs business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery |
ISSN: | 1916-0216 1916-0208 |
Popis: | Background It is well-known that ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) predominantly reflect utricular function whilst cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) reflect saccular function. To date, there are no published reports on the systemic evaluation of utricular and saccular function in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), nor are there any reports on the differences in VEMPs between patients with recurrent and non-recurrent BPPV. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in cervical and ocular (c/o)VEMPs between patients with BPPV and normal controls, as well as between patients with recurrent and non-recurrent BPPV. Methods Thirty patients with posterior canal BPPV and 30 healthy subjects (as normal controls) were prospectively enrolled. cVEMP and oVEMP testing using 500 Hz tone-burst stimuli were performed on all. VEMP tests were repeated 3 times on each subject to ensure reliability and reproducibility of responses. VEMPs were defined as present or absent. Abnormal VEMP was defined by lack of VEMP response. Results In the control group, abnormal cVEMPs responses were detected in 6.67 % and abnormal oVEMPs responses were detected in 3.34 %. In BPPV patients (10 with recurrent BPPV, 20 with non-recurrent BPPV), abnormal cVEMPs responses were detected in 30 % and abnormal oVEMPs responses were detected in 56.7 %. More patients with BPPV showed abnormal responses in c/oVEMPs as compared to the control group (p 0.05). Differences in abnormal oVEMP responses (non-recurrent BPPV, 40 %; recurrent BPPV, 90 %) were significant (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |