Monopathogenic vs multipathogenic explanations of pemphigus pathophysiology

Autor: Animesh A. Sinha, Roberta Lotti, Nicola Cirillo, Michael Hertl, A. Razzaque Ahmed, Frédéric Caux, Agustín España Alonso, Enno Schmidt, María J. López-Zabalza, Robert Gniadecki, Carlo Pincelli, Marian Dmochowski, Marco Carrozzo, Sergei A. Grando, Eli Sprecher, Mark R. Pittelkow
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
DOI: 10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0625
Popis: This viewpoint highlights major, partly controversial concepts about the pathogenesis of pemphigus. The monopathogenic theory explains intra-epidermal blistering through the "desmoglein (Dsg) compensation" hypothesis, according to which an antibody-dependent disabling of Dsg 1- and/or Dsg 3-mediated cell-cell attachments of keratinocytes (KCs) is sufficient to disrupt epidermal integrity and cause blistering. The multipathogenic theory explains intra-epidermal blistering through the "multiple hit" hypothesis stating that a simultaneous and synchronized inactivation of the physiological mechanisms regulating and/or mediating intercellular adhesion of KCs is necessary to disrupt epidermal integrity. The major premise for a multipathogenic theory is that a single type of autoantibody induces only reversible changes, so that affected KCs can recover due to a self-repair. The damage, however, becomes irreversible when the salvage pathway and/or other cell functions are altered by a partnering autoantibody and/or other pathogenic factors. Future studies are needed to (i) corroborate these findings, (ii) characterize in detail patient populations with non-Dsg-specific autoantibodies, and (iii) determine the extent of the contribution of non-Dsg antibodies in disease pathophysiology.
Databáze: OpenAIRE