Comparison of transcatheter to surgical aortic valve implantation in high risk patients : a nationwide study in France

Autor: Jean-François Obadia, Stéphanie Polazzi, Léa Pascal, Antoine Duclos, Xavier Armoiry
Přispěvatelé: Matériaux, ingénierie et science [Villeurbanne] (MATEIS), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), ONERA - The French Aerospace Lab [Toulouse], ONERA, Département d'information médicale, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Université de Lyon
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Aortic valve
proportional hazards model
clinical outcome
heart failure
morbidity
high risk patient
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
[SPI.MAT]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Materials
cause of death
FIne and Gray competing risk model
hazard ratio
0302 clinical medicine
Aortic valve replacement
Risk of mortality
Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Cause of death
adult
Hazard ratio
hospitalization cost
longitudinal study
health care cost
risk assessment
cohort analysis
3. Good health
aged
female
medicine.anatomical_structure
priority journal
Cardiology
France
cerebrovascular accident
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cohort study
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
medicine.medical_specialty
heart infarction
Article
03 medical and health sciences
male
statistical analysis
Internal medicine
follow up
aortic valve replacement
controlled study
human
intermethod comparison
outcome assessment
propensity score
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
hospital mortality
business.industry
Proportional hazards model
EuroSCORE
aortic valve disease
medicine.disease
major clinical study
multicenter study
confidence interval
pacemaker implantation
Surgery
business
RD
RC
Zdroj: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Elsevier, 2018, 156 (3), pp.1017-1025.e4. ⟨10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.092⟩
ISSN: 0022-5223
1097-685X
Popis: cited By 3; International audience; Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes and direct costs at 5 years between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using real-world evidence. Methods: We performed a nationwide longitudinal study using data from the French Hospital Information System from 2009 to 2015. We matched, inside hospitals, 2 cohorts of adults who underwent TAVI or SAVR during 2010 on propensity score based on patient characteristics. Outcomes analysis included mortality, morbidity, and total costs and with a maximum 60-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared between cohorts using hazard ratios (HRs) estimated from a Cox proportional hazards model for all-cause death, and from Fine and Gray's competing risk model for morbidity. Results: Based on a cohort of 1598 patients (799 in each group) from 27 centers, a higher risk of death was observed after 1 year with TAVI compared with SAVR (16.8% vs 12.8%, respectively; HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.72) and was sustained up to 5 years (52.4% vs 37.2%; HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.33-1.84). At 5 years, the risk of stroke was increased (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.07-2.54) as was myocardial infarction (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.12-4.69) and pacemaker implantation (HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.81-3.17) after TAVI. The hospitalization costs per patient at 5 years were €69,083 after TAVI and €55,687 after SAVR (P
Databáze: OpenAIRE