| Autor: |
Mary Schmidt-Owens, Ann Neville Miller, Vanessa Navas, Kimberley Thrash, Richard I. Zraick, Michael Deichen, Lisvet Luceno, Shreya Atmakuri, Teresa Ayers |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Patient Education and Counseling. 104:2700-2705 |
| ISSN: |
0738-3991 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.041 |
| Popis: |
Objectives The purpose of this research was to investigate the extent to which recommended characteristics of teach-back were employed by providers in a university Student Health Services department, and to evaluate its association with patient understanding, self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Method The study employed a causal comparative design. Audio recordings of 87 primary care interviews were transcribed and coded for presence and characteristics of teach-back. Patients and providers filled out post-encounter questionnaires. Results When teach-back was used, most recommended characteristics of teach-back were regularly employed. However, providers rarely placed the onus for understanding on themselves, and almost never “closed the loop” by asking patients to repeat back information until they got it correct. Teach-back was associated with higher patient self-efficacy, and high fidelity of implementation with better patient understanding of the reason for the treatment plan. Conclusions Findings add to existing evidence regarding effectiveness of teach-back. Additional benefits may be realized when implementation is true to recommended characteristics. More research is needed into the necessity of closing the loop and placing onus on the provider. Practice implications Given that neither patients nor providers accurately gauged the level of patient understanding in the medical encounter, teach-back may offer a simple, quick means of reinforcing provider health information and raising patient self-efficacy. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect