Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection
| Autor: | Cesar Santiago, Reza A Gamagami, Andrew Kassir, Gustavio Plasencia, Henry J. Lujan, Luca Giordano |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Robotic assisted Patient demographics Sigmoid Robotic-assisted Sigmoid resection Robotic Surgical Procedures Colon surgery Colon Sigmoid Minimally invasive surgery Outcome Assessment Health Care Medicine Humans Laparoscopy Colectomy Aged Retrospective Studies medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Sigmoid colon Perioperative Middle Aged Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Propensity score matching Female business Research Article |
| Zdroj: | JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons |
| ISSN: | 1938-3797 |
| Popis: | Background and Objectives: Published comparisons of minimally invasive approaches to colon surgery are limited. The objective of the current study is to compare the effectiveness of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Methods: A multicenter retrospective comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes from consecutive robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sigmoid resections performed between 2010 and 2015 by six general and colorectal surgeons, who are experienced in both robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgical techniques and who had >50 annual case volumes for each approach. Baseline characteristics and surgical risk factors between the two groups were balanced using a propensity score methodology with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Mean standardized differences were reported, and in all instances, a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Three hundred thirty-six cases (robotic-assisted, n = 211; laparoscopic, n = 125) met eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Following weighting, patient demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable between the robotic-assisted (n = 344) and laparoscopic (n = 349) groups. The laparoscopic group was associated with shorter operating room and surgical times. The robotic-assisted group had lower estimated blood loss and shorter time to first flatus compared to the laparoscopic group. Rates of complications post discharge to 30 d tended to be lower for the RA group: 5.1% vs 8.6% [p = 0.0657]. The RA group also had lower rates of readmissions and reoperations: 4% vs 8% [p = 0.029] and 0.5% vs 5.1% [p = 0.0003], respectively. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted sigmoid colon resection is clinically effective and provides a minimally invasive alternative to the laparoscopic approach with improved intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal patients. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|