The effects of different standard setting methods and the composition of borderline groups: a study within a law curriculum

Autor:	Marlies Veestraeten, Marlies Baeten, Eva Kyndt, Sofie Pottier, Filip Dochy
Jazyk:	angličtina
Rok vydání:	2009
Předmět:	Point (typography) education Statistics Mathematics education Student evaluation standard setting methods composition borderline group Composition (combinatorics) Linear discriminant analysis Psychology Curriculum Education Test (assessment)
Popis:	The aim of this study was to examine the effect of different standard setting methods on the size and composition of the borderline group, on the discrimination between different types of students and on the types of students passing with one method but failing with another. A total of 107 university students were classified into 4 different types of students and completed two examinations. Nine different methods to determine cut scores were applied. Results show that size and composition of the borderline group differed for the different standard setting methods. Results also indicate that it is difficult or even impossible to point out one method across tests as the most appropriate one in terms of discriminating between different students. Situation characteristics such as type and level of difficulty of the test are important determinants when a particular standard setting method has to be chosen. ispartof: Studies in Educational Evaluation vol:35 issue:4 pages:174-182 status: published
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::7bb34bc3137423fd505d87cd1b3a6102 https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/257882 Zobrazit plný text záznamu