Accuracy of biplanar linear radiography versus conventional radiographs when used for lower limb and implant measurements
Autor: | Andrew Kean Seng Lim, James Hoi Po Hui, Chen Xi Kasia Chua, Si Heng Sharon Tan |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Radiography Lower limb 03 medical and health sciences Imaging Three-Dimensional 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Femur Retrospective Studies Digital radiography 030222 orthopedics business.industry Anteroposterior radiograph Significant difference Reproducibility of Results 030229 sport sciences General Medicine Conventional radiographs Lower Extremity Orthopedic surgery Surgery Implant business Nuclear medicine |
Zdroj: | Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 142:735-745 |
ISSN: | 1434-3916 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00402-020-03700-3 |
Popis: | The current standard of care for measuring lower extremity length and angular discrepancies is using a full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph. However, there has been increasing interest to use biplanar linear EOS imaging as an alternative. This study aims to compare lower extremity length and implant measurements between biplanar linear and conventional radiographs. In this 5-year retrospective study, all patients who had a standing full-length anteroposterior and biplanar linear radiographs (EOS®) that include the lower extremities done within one year of each other were included. Patients who underwent surgery in between the imaging, underwent surgeries that could result in graduated length or angulated corrections and inadequate exposure of the lower extremity were excluded. Four radiographic segments were measured to assess lower limb alignment and length measurements. Height and width measurements of implants were performed for patients who had implants in both imaging. When comparing imaging and actual implant dimensions, biplanar linear radiographs were accurate in measuring actual implant height (median difference = − 0.14 cm, p = 0.66), and width (median difference = − 0.13 cm, p = 0.71). However, conventional radiographs were inaccurate in measuring actual implant height (median difference = 0.19 cm, p = 0.01) and width (median difference = 0.61 cm, p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |