Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Autor: | Keh-chung Lin, Chia-Hsiung Cheng, Chih Chi Chen, Chia-Ling Chen, Chih jou Lai, Tsai yu Shih, Yu-wei Hsieh, Ching-yi Wu |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Male
030506 rehabilitation Time Factors medicine.medical_treatment Video Recording Medicine (miscellaneous) Functional Laterality Mirror therapy law.invention Study Protocol Disability Evaluation 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial Clinical Protocols law Modified Rankin Scale Feedback Sensory Telerehabilitation Surveys and Questionnaires Pharmacology (medical) Stroke Aged 80 and over lcsh:R5-920 Rehabilitation Motor Cortex Stroke Rehabilitation Action observation Magnetoencephalography Middle Aged Functional Independence Measure Treatment Outcome Research Design Visual Perception Female 0305 other medical science Motor learning lcsh:Medicine (General) Adult medicine.medical_specialty Taiwan Motor Activity Upper Extremity 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult Physical medicine and rehabilitation Predictive Value of Tests medicine Humans Neurorehabilitation Aged Afferent Pathways business.industry Recovery of Function medicine.disease Imitative Behavior Physical therapy business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Trials, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017) Trials |
ISSN: | 1745-6215 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13063-017-2205-z |
Popis: | Background Loss of upper-extremity motor function is one of the most debilitating deficits following stroke. Two promising treatment approaches, action observation therapy (AOT) and mirror therapy (MT), aim to enhance motor learning and promote neural reorganization in patients through different afferent inputs and patterns of visual feedback. Both approaches involve different patterns of motor observation, imitation, and execution but share some similar neural bases of the mirror neuron system. AOT and MT used in stroke rehabilitation may confer differential benefits and neural activities that remain to be determined. This clinical trial aims to investigate and compare treatment effects and neural activity changes of AOT and MT with those of the control intervention in patients with subacute stroke. Methods/design An estimated total of 90 patients with subacute stroke will be recruited for this study. All participants will be randomly assigned to receive AOT, MT, or control intervention for a 3-week training period (15 sessions). Outcome measurements will be taken at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. For the magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we anticipate that we will recruit 12 to 15 patients per group. The primary outcome will be the Fugl-Meyer Assessment score. Secondary outcomes will include the modified Rankin Scale, the Box and Block Test, the ABILHAND questionnaire, the Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery, the Functional Independence Measure, activity monitors, the Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0, and MEG signals. Discussion This clinical trial will provide scientific evidence of treatment effects on motor, functional outcomes, and neural activity mechanisms after AOT and MT in patients with subacute stroke. Further application and use of AOT and MT may include telerehabilitation or home-based rehabilitation through web-based or video teaching. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02871700. Registered on 1 August 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2205-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |