Clinical neuropsychology in Canada: results from the 2020 AACN, NAN, SCN professional practice and 'salary survey'
Autor: | Paul J. Moberg, Nathaniel W. Nelson, Kristen M. Klipfel, Jerry J. Sweet |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Canada 050103 clinical psychology Medical education Salaries and Fringe Benefits 05 social sciences Neuropsychology Professional Practice Professional practice Neuropsychological Tests Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Clinical neuropsychology Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Surveys and Questionnaires Critical care nursing Developmental and Educational Psychology Humans Female 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Salary Psychology |
DOI: | 10.6084/m9.figshare.14742675.v1 |
Popis: | Objective: The current study summarizes the results of a 2020 survey that solicited information regarding backgrounds, beliefs, practices, and incomes of clinical neuropsychologists who practice in Canada. Methods: Clinical neuropsychologists who practice in Canada were invited to participate in an online survey that was available from 1/17/20 to 4/02/20. Available survey findings were obtained from 111 respondents, which reflects a response rate of 51.3% of the 216 doctoral-level Canadian neuropsychologists identified in at least one major North American or international professional organization membership list (AACN, INS, NAN, or SCN). Results: Most of the current respondents were White/Caucasian women who identified as adult providers and worked full-time in urban institutional settings. Four Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec) accounted for more than 91% of the current respondent sample. Incomes and career satisfactions were largely encouraging, though some important variations were noted by province, work setting, and professional identity. Incomes were significantly associated with forensic practices and years of clinical experience. Most respondents made use of technician support in their practices, largely to increase productivity and patient volume. Only a small minority of respondents were board-certified and there was generally limited interest in future board certification. Conclusions: While important similarities were observed in the current Canadian sample relative to recent survey findings obtained in a U.S. sample, results also reveal a number of important differences that serve as important areas of future consideration. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |