| Autor: |
Van den Bos, Kees, Biemans, J.W.A., Bauw, E., Burgerlijk Recht I, Afd Privaatrecht, Bestuursrecht, Leerstoel Bos, Notarieel goederenrecht, Montaigne Centrum voor Rechtspleging en conflictoplossing, Social-cognitive and interpersonal determinants of behaviour, UCALL / Aansprakelijkheid en verantwoordelijkheid |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Burgerlijk Recht I, Afd Privaatrecht, Bestuursrecht, Leerstoel Bos, Notarieel goederenrecht, Montaigne Centrum voor Rechtspleging en conflictoplossing, Social-cognitive and interpersonal determinants of behaviour, UCALL / Aansprakelijkheid en verantwoordelijkheid |
| Jazyk: |
Dutch; Flemish |
| Rok vydání: |
2019 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Recht der werkelijkheid, 40(1), 28 |
| ISSN: |
1380-6424 |
| Popis: |
This quantitative empirical research project describes how notaries evaluate disciplinary jurisdiction. Findings show that perceived procedural justice matters for notaries’ trust in the disciplinary jurisdiction of their cases. For example, those respondents who had been involved in a disciplinary case themselves, rated the disciplinary judge with a 5.3 on a 10-point scale when procedural justice was perceived by them to be relatively low. In contrast, when respondents who had been involved in a disciplinary case perceived procedural justice to be relatively high they rated the disciplinary judge with 7.6 on the same 10-point scale. This suggests that perceived procedural justice matters among an interesting type of professionals (notaries) who are involved in an interesting procedure in their profession (a disciplinary evaluation of their professional handling) in which important decisions are made. The current paper can contribute to the development of a barometer of notary disciplinary law. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
