Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus

Autor: Gannon C.K. Mak, Dominic Nc Tsang, Kitty K.Y. Wong, Edman Tk Lam, Nancy L.S. Chow, Rickjason C.W. Chan, Stephen S.Y. Lau, C.S. Lau
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Virology
ISSN: 1873-5967
1386-6532
Popis: Highlights • We compared analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity for the three commercially available rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. • The three RAD kits varied 102 to 105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. • Clinical sensitivity of RAD kits ranged from 22.9% to 71.4% for detecting respiratory specimens from COVID-19 patients. • Understanding the clinical characteristics of different RAD kits can increase the likelihood of positive results.
Background Numerous rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits for diagnosing COVID-19 patients are available in the market recently. Objective To compare analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity for the three commercially available RAD kits. Study Design Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined by limit of detection (LOD) using PCR as a reference method. Clinical sensitivity was evaluated by using respiratory specimens collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. Results The LOD results showed that the three RAD kits varied 102 to 105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. Clinical sensitivity of RAD kits ranged from 22.9% to 71.4% for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients. Conclusions Although RAD kits were less sensitive than RT-PCR, understanding the clinical characteristics of different RAD kits can guide us to obtain suitable specimens for testing. The likelihood of positive results for RAD kits will be higher.
Databáze: OpenAIRE