Bovine Brucellosis in Gauteng, South Africa: Seroprevalence amongst Cattle Handlers and Variables Associated with Seropositive Cattle Herds, 2014–2016

Autor: D.A. Abernethy, Jennifer Rossouw, Eric Etter, Krpasha Govindasamy, Peter N. Thompson, Bernice Nerine Harris
Přispěvatelé: University of Pretoria [South Africa], National Institute for Communicable Diseases [Johannesburg] (NICD), Aberystwyth University, Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes (UMR ASTRE), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), This research was jointly funded by the University of Pretoria Animal and Zoonotic Diseases Institutional Research Theme (AZD IRT) and by the South African Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority (HWSETA) and the APC was funded by University of Pretoria.
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Veterinary medicine
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
animal diseases
Herd health
L73 - Maladies des animaux
0403 veterinary science
Bovine brucellosis
South Africa
0302 clinical medicine
Facteur de risque
Brucellose
Immunology and Allergy
Medicine
RBT ®
BrucellaCapt ®
2. Zero hunger
seroprevalence
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
3. Good health
Travailleur agricole
Infectious Diseases
risk factor
brucellosis
veterinary official
S50 - Santé humaine
cattle handler
BrucellaCapt®
IgG ELISA®
IgM ELISA®
RBT®
B. abortus
IgM ELISA ®
Microbiology (medical)
040301 veterinary sciences
030231 tropical medicine
Article
03 medical and health sciences
Maladie de l'homme
Seroprevalence
Farm workers
Surveillance épidémiologique
Risk factor
Igg elisa
Molecular Biology
IgG ELISA ®
Transmission des maladies
Bovin
General Immunology and Microbiology
business.industry
Brucellosis
medicine.disease
Enquête pathologique
Herd
business
Zdroj: Pathogens; Volume 10; Issue 12; Pages: 1547
Pathogens
Pathogens, MDPI, 2021, 10 (12), pp.1547. ⟨10.3390/pathogens10121547⟩
Pathogens, Vol 10, Iss 1547, p 1547 (2021)
ISSN: 2076-0817
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10121547
Popis: In South Africa, the prevalence of cattle handler exposure to Brucella on cattle farms is unknown and risk factors and cattle symptoms associated with infected cattle herds are unavailable. To address this gap, a case-control study of cattle herds was conducted in Gauteng province and farm workers and veterinary officials were tested for exposure to Brucella. Seroprevalence amongst farm workers exposed to case herds ranged from 4.0% (BrucellaCapt®) to 16.7% (IgG ELISA®), compared to those exposed to control herds, where seroprevalence ranged from 1.9% (BrucellaCapt®) to 5.7% (IgG ELISA®). Seroprevalence amongst veterinary officials was significantly greater compared to farm workers exposed to case herds for the outcome RBT+ IgM- IgG+ (OR = 11.1, 95% CI: 2.5–49.9, p = 0.002) and RBT- IgM- IgG+ (OR = 6.3, 95% CI: 2.3–17.3, p < 0.001). Risk factors associated with being an infected herd were: being a government-sponsored farm vs. private farm (OR 4.0; 95% CI: 1.4–11.3; p = 0.009), beef vs. dairy herd (OR 7.9; 95% CI: 1.4–44.9; p = 0.020), open vs. closed herd (OR 3.3; 95% CI: 1.1–10.4; p = 0.038) and the presence of antelope on the farm (OR 29.4; 95% CI: 4.0–218.2; p = 0.001). Abortions (OR = 5.1; 95% CI: 2.0–13.3; p < 0.001), weak calves in the herd (OR = 8.0; 95% CI: 2.6–24.4; p < 0.001), reduction in number of calves born (OR = 9.0; 95% CI: 2.1–43.6; p < 0.001), reduction in conception rate (OR = 3.9; 95% CI: 0.8–18.3; p = 0.046), hygromas in cattle (p = 0.011) and farmers reporting brucellosis-like symptoms in their farm workers or in him/herself (OR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.3–8.7; p = 0.006) were more likely to be associated with Brucella infected herds than control herds. This evidence can be used in strategic planning to protect both human and herd health.
Databáze: OpenAIRE