Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review
Autor: | Rica Joy Flor, Françoise Lescourret, Alain Ratnadass, Jean-Philippe Deguine, Jean-Noël Aubertot, Kris A.G. Wyckhuys |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Peuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical (UMR PVBMT), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Département Systèmes Biologiques (Cirad-BIOS), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad), AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), International Rice Research Institute [Philippines] (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR), Unité de recherche Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles (PSH), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Chrysalis Consulting, Fonctionnement agroécologique et performances des systèmes de cultures horticoles (UPR HORTSYS), Département Performances des systèmes de production et de transformation tropicaux (Cirad-PERSYST), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
Integrated pest management H01 - Protection des végétaux - Considérations générales [SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture Social ecology agroécologie H02 - Pesticides Gestion intégrée des ravageurs 01 natural sciences Protection des plantes 2. Zero hunger Lutte antiravageur Ravageur des plantes Food systems Agroécosystème Environmental Engineering Agroecological crop protection Pesticides Research approaches Agroecology Environmental planning Sustainable development business.industry Reduction of pesticides 15. Life on land H10 - Ravageurs des plantes Crop protection Pesticide 010602 entomology Right to food Protection de l'environnement 13. Climate action Agriculture IPM Business Agronomy and Crop Science 010606 plant biology & botany |
Zdroj: | Agronomy for Sustainable Development Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2021, 41 (3), ⟨10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w⟩ Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2021, 41 (3), ⟨10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w⟩ |
ISSN: | 1774-0746 1773-0155 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w⟩ |
Popis: | Integrated Pest Management (IPM) provides an illustration of how crop protection has (or has not) evolved over the past six decades. Throughout this period, IPM has endeavored to promote sustainable forms of agriculture, pursued sharp reductions in synthetic pesticide use, and thereby resolved myriad socio-economic, environmental, and human health challenges. Global pesticide use has, however, largely continued unabated, with negative implications for farmer livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, and the human right to food. In this review, we examine how IPM has developed over time and assess whether this concept remains suited to present-day challenges. We believe that despite many good intentions, hard realities need to be faced. 1) We identify the following major weaknesses: i) a multitude of IPM definitions that generate unnecessary confusion; ii) inconsistencies between IPM concepts, practice, and policies; iii) insufficient engagement of farmers in IPM technology development and frequent lack of basic understanding of its underlying ecological concepts. 2) By diverting from the fundamental IPM principles, integration of practices has proceeded along serendipitous routes, proven ineffective, and yielded unacceptable outcomes. 3) We show that in the majority of cases, chemical control still remains the basis of plant health programs. 4) Furthermore, IPM research is often lagging, tends to be misguided, and pays insufficient attention to ecology and to the ecological functioning of agroecosystems. 5) Since the 1960s, IPM rules have been twisted, its foundational concepts have degraded and its serious (farm-level) implementation has not advanced. To remedy this, we are proposing Agroecological Crop Protection as a concept that captures how agroecology can be optimally put to the service of crop protection. Agroecological Crop Protection constitutes an interdisciplinary scientific field that comprises an orderly strategy (and clear prioritization) of practices at the field, farm, and agricultural landscape level and a dimension of social and organizational ecology. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |