Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review

Autor: Rica Joy Flor, Françoise Lescourret, Alain Ratnadass, Jean-Philippe Deguine, Jean-Noël Aubertot, Kris A.G. Wyckhuys
Přispěvatelé: Peuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical (UMR PVBMT), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Département Systèmes Biologiques (Cirad-BIOS), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad), AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), International Rice Research Institute [Philippines] (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR), Unité de recherche Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles (PSH), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Chrysalis Consulting, Fonctionnement agroécologique et performances des systèmes de cultures horticoles (UPR HORTSYS), Département Performances des systèmes de production et de transformation tropicaux (Cirad-PERSYST), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
0106 biological sciences
Integrated pest management
H01 - Protection des végétaux - Considérations générales
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
Social ecology
agroécologie
H02 - Pesticides
Gestion intégrée des ravageurs
01 natural sciences
Protection des plantes
2. Zero hunger
Lutte antiravageur
Ravageur des plantes
Food systems
Agroécosystème
Environmental Engineering
Agroecological crop protection
Pesticides
Research approaches
Agroecology
Environmental planning
Sustainable development
business.industry
Reduction of pesticides
15. Life on land
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
Crop protection
Pesticide
010602 entomology
Right to food
Protection de l'environnement
13. Climate action
Agriculture
IPM
Business
Agronomy and Crop Science
010606 plant biology & botany
Zdroj: Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2021, 41 (3), ⟨10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w⟩
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2021, 41 (3), ⟨10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w⟩
ISSN: 1774-0746
1773-0155
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w⟩
Popis: Integrated Pest Management (IPM) provides an illustration of how crop protection has (or has not) evolved over the past six decades. Throughout this period, IPM has endeavored to promote sustainable forms of agriculture, pursued sharp reductions in synthetic pesticide use, and thereby resolved myriad socio-economic, environmental, and human health challenges. Global pesticide use has, however, largely continued unabated, with negative implications for farmer livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, and the human right to food. In this review, we examine how IPM has developed over time and assess whether this concept remains suited to present-day challenges. We believe that despite many good intentions, hard realities need to be faced. 1) We identify the following major weaknesses: i) a multitude of IPM definitions that generate unnecessary confusion; ii) inconsistencies between IPM concepts, practice, and policies; iii) insufficient engagement of farmers in IPM technology development and frequent lack of basic understanding of its underlying ecological concepts. 2) By diverting from the fundamental IPM principles, integration of practices has proceeded along serendipitous routes, proven ineffective, and yielded unacceptable outcomes. 3) We show that in the majority of cases, chemical control still remains the basis of plant health programs. 4) Furthermore, IPM research is often lagging, tends to be misguided, and pays insufficient attention to ecology and to the ecological functioning of agroecosystems. 5) Since the 1960s, IPM rules have been twisted, its foundational concepts have degraded and its serious (farm-level) implementation has not advanced. To remedy this, we are proposing Agroecological Crop Protection as a concept that captures how agroecology can be optimally put to the service of crop protection. Agroecological Crop Protection constitutes an interdisciplinary scientific field that comprises an orderly strategy (and clear prioritization) of practices at the field, farm, and agricultural landscape level and a dimension of social and organizational ecology.
Databáze: OpenAIRE