Three opportunities for standardization: A literature review of the variation among pharmacists’ patient care services terminology
| Autor: | Nathaniel M. Rickles, Jennifer L. Bacci, Stephanie Harriman McGrath, Stephanie A. Gernant, Stefanie P. Ferreri, Michelle A. Chui, Marie Smith, Charlie Upton |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Standardization
Pharmaceutical Science Pharmacy Pharmacists 030226 pharmacology & pharmacy Article Terminology Medical Subject Headings 03 medical and health sciences Professional Role 0302 clinical medicine Medication therapy management Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Health communication Accreditation Pharmacies Medical education business.industry Standardized Nursing Terminology Reference Standards Education Pharmacy Pharmaceutical Services Professional association Patient Care Psychology business |
| Zdroj: | Res Social Adm Pharm |
| ISSN: | 1551-7411 |
| Popis: | Background Variation describing pharmacists’ patient care services exist, and this variation contributes to the prevalent misunderstanding of pharmacists' roles. In contrast, standard phraseology is a critical practice among highly reliable organizations and a way to reduce variation and confusion. Objective This work aims to identify and define pharmacists’ patient care service terms to identify redundancies and opportunities for standardization. Methods Between May to August 2018, terms and definitions were searched via PubMed, Google Scholar and statements/policies of professional pharmacy organizations. Two references per term were sought to provide an “early definition” and a “contemporary definition.” Only literature published in English was included, and data gathered from each citation included the date published, the term's definition, and characterization of the reference's source as either a regulatory or professional body. A five-person expert panel used an iterative technique to revise and verify the list of included terms and subsequent literature review results. Terms were then searched in the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Heading Database (MeSH) in July, 2019. Results There are fifteen commonly misunderstood terms that refer to the patient care services provided by pharmacists. The appearance of these terms in the literature spanned nearly five decades. Nearly half of terms appeared first in regulatory, law or policy documents; of these, two terms had contemporary definitions appearing in the professional literature that differed from their early regulatory definition. Three opportunities to improve standardization include: (1) Implementation of standardized phraseology systems similar to nursing's Clinical Care Classification System; (2) Academics' adherence to standardized MeSH terms; and (3) Clarification of pharmacy education accreditation standards. Conclusion Numerous terms are used to describe pharmacists' patient care services, with many definitions of terms overlapping in several key components. The profession has made concerted efforts to consolidate and standardize terminology in the past, but more opportunities exist. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect