Impact of the Cell Cycle Progression Test on Physician and Patient Treatment Selection for Localized Prostate Cancer
| Autor: | Naveen Kella, Thaylon Davis, Kirstin M. Roundy, Michael K. Brawer, Kristen Rushton, Mark L. Gonzalgo, E. David Crawford, Rajesh R. Kaldate, Judd Boczko, Charles E. Grier, Neal D. Shore, Fernando J. Bianco, Brian J. Moran |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Oncology
Adult Male medicine.medical_specialty Prostate biopsy Visual analogue scale Urology 030232 urology & nephrology Androgen deprivation therapy 03 medical and health sciences Prostate cancer 0302 clinical medicine Prostate Internal medicine medicine Humans Prospective Studies Registries Practice Patterns Physicians' Prospective cohort study Aged Gynecology Aged 80 and over medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Cell Cycle Prostatic Neoplasms Patient Preference Cell cycle Middle Aged medicine.disease Prostate-specific antigen medicine.anatomical_structure Molecular Diagnostic Techniques 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis business |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of urology. 195(3) |
| ISSN: | 1527-3792 |
| Popis: | The cell cycle progression test is a validated molecular assay that assesses prostate cancer specific disease progression and mortality risk when combined with clinicopathological parameters. We present the results from PROCEDE-1000, a large, prospective registry designed to evaluate the impact of the cell cycle progression test on shared treatment decision making for patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.Untreated patients with newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study and the cell cycle progression test was performed on the initial prostate biopsy tissue. A set of 4 sequential surveys tracked changes relative to initial therapy recommendations (before cell cycle progression) based on clinicopathological parameters following physician review of the cell cycle progression test result, physician/patient review of the cell cycle progression test results and a minimum of 3 months of clinical followup (actual treatment).Of the 1,596 patients enrolled in this registry 1,206 were eligible for analysis. There was a significant reduction in the treatment burden recorded at each successive evaluation (p0.0001), with the mean number of treatments per patient decreasing from 1.72 before the cell cycle progression test to 1.16 in actual followup. The cell cycle progression test caused a change in actual treatment in 47.8% of patients. Of these changes 72.1% were reductions and 26.9% were increases in treatment. For each clinical risk category there was a significant change in treatment modality (intervention vs nonintervention) before vs after cell cycle progression testing (p=0.0002).The cell cycle progression test has a significant impact in assisting physicians and patients reach personalized treatment decisions. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|