Economic evaluation plan of a RCT of hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented hemiarthroplasty versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures: the WHiTE5 trial
| Autor: | Nicholas R. Parsons, Juul Achten, May Ee Png, M A Fernandez, Xavier L. Griffin, Matthew L. Costa, Jenny Gould, Alwin McGibbon |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Cement Economic law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Primary outcome Randomized controlled trial law Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Hip fracture Hip Inpatient care business.industry 030503 health policy & services General Engineering Plan National health service medicine.disease Healthcare utilization Economic evaluation Physical therapy Resource use Hemiarthroplasty 0305 other medical science business |
| Zdroj: | Bone & Joint Open |
| ISSN: | 2633-1462 |
| Popis: | Aim This paper describes the methods applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty among hip fracture patients in the World Hip Trauma Evaluation Five (WHiTE5) trial. Methods A within-trial cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be conducted at four months postinjury from a health system (National Health Service and personal social services) perspective. Resource use pertaining to healthcare utilization (i.e. inpatient care, physiotherapy, social care, and home adaptations), and utility measures (quality-adjusted life years) will be collected at one and four months (primary outcome endpoint) postinjury; only treatment of complications will be captured at 12 months. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Conclusion The planned analysis strategy described here records our intent to conduct a within-trial CUA alongside the WHiTE5 trial. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|