[What's the best assessment of preload after cardiac surgery?]
Autor: | Giovanni Vivona, Luigi Belloni, Armando Natale, Maria Rosario Piccirillo, Giovanni Trosino, Gennaro Ismeno, Luigi Piazza, Giovanni De Martino, Marianna Sebastopoli |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2005 |
Předmět: |
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Male medicine.medical_specialty Diastole Coronary Artery Bypass Off-Pump lcsh:Medicine Hemodynamics Coronary Disease off-pump coronary artery by-pass graft Coronary artery disease Predictive Value of Tests Internal medicine medicine Humans Ventricular Function Prospective Studies Pulmonary Wedge Pressure Pulmonary wedge pressure Aorta Postoperative Care pulmonary catheter transesophageal echocardiography business.industry lcsh:R Stroke Volume Stroke volume medicine.disease Cardiac surgery Preload Intensive Care Units Anesthesia Predictive value of tests Catheterization Swan-Ganz Cardiology Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Blood Flow Velocity Echocardiography Transesophageal |
Zdroj: | Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, Vol 64, Iss 1 (2005) |
ISSN: | 1122-0643 |
Popis: | Objective: The assessment of the role of transesophageal echocardiography and invasive tests with pulmonary modified catheter to monitor the preload indexes in patients in intensive- care-unit after cardiac coronary surgery. Materials and Methods: Between January and December 2004 24 patients (14 male, 10 female) with coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled for preload assessment during off-pump myocardial revascularization. Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP), Left Ventricular End Diastolic Indexed Area (LVEDAI), Δ Aortic Velocity (ΔVAo), Right Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (RVEDVI) as preload indexes were evaluated. Transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary modified catheter monitoring were performed during the preoperative period at T1 and after fluid infusion (T2). Patients were considered Responders (R) or No Responders (NR) if the Stroke Volume Index increase at T2 was >20% with respect to T1. Results: Mean T1 PCWP was similar in both groups (12.8±2.2 in R vs. 11.4±3 mmHg in NR; p=NS) and mean increase of PCWP at T2 was similar in both groups (1.5±0.3% in R vs. 1.2±3% in NR; p=NS). Mean T1 RVEDVI was similar in both groups (97.33±34 in R vs. 101±21 ml/m2 in NR; p=NS); T2 RVEDVI was similar in R and NR Groups (122.11±49 vs. 138.54±30 ml/m2; p=NS); mean T1 and T2 LVEDAI was similar in R and NR (11.2±3.5 vs. 10.2±2.3 at T1 and 14.04±3.35 vs. 14.67±2.1 cm2/m2 at T2 respectively; p=NS). Higher mean value of T1 ΔVAo (20±7% in R vs. 10±2% in NR; p=0.006) were recorded while similar mean value of T2 ΔVAo were observed (11±3% in R vs. 5±2% in NR; p=0.743). Correlation index between T1 and T2 ΔVAo (R=0.82) in R was significant (p=0.0002), while correlation index between T1 and T2 ΔVAo (R=0.11) in NR was not significant. Conclusions: Our study showed in patients soon after coronary cardiac surgery ΔVAo is the only predictor of “fluid responsiveness” and of ventricular compliance. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |