Effect on osseointegration of two implant macro-designs:A histomorphometric analysis of bicortically installed implants in different topographic sites of rabbit’s tibiae

Autor: Marco Caneva, David Peñarrocha-Oltra, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago, Daniele Botticelli, Jose Viña-Almunia, Berta García-Mira, David Soto-Peñaloza, José-Javier Martin-de-Llano
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Soto Penaloza, David ; Caneva, Marco ; Viña Almunia, José ; Martín de Llano, José Javier ; García Mira, Berta ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Botticelli, Daniele ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Effect on osseointegration of two implant macro-designs : a histomorphometric analysis of bicortically installed implants in different topographic sites of rabbit?s tibiae. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 24 4 2019: 4
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL
r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
instname
Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal
RODERIC. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat de Valéncia
ISSN: 1698-6946
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22825
Popis: Background To evaluate the effect of two different implant macro-designs on the sequential osseointegration at bicortically installed implants in the rabbit tibia. A further aim is to compare the osseointegration at different topographic zones. Material and Methods 27 New Zealand rabbits were implemented. Two implants, one for each macro-design (Ticare Inhex® or Ticare Quattro®, Mozo-Grau, Valladolid, Spain), were randomly implanted in the diaphysis or metaphysis of each tibia. The flaps were sutured to allow a submerged healing. The animals were sacrificed after 2, 4 or 8 weeks. Ground sections were prepared and analyzed. Results No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for newly formed bone in contact with the implant surface, being about 16%, 19% and 33% in both groups, after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of healing. Bone apposition was slightly higher in the diaphysis, reaching values of 36.4% in the diaphysis, and 29.3% in the metaphysis at 8 weeks of healing. It was observed that the implant position showed a statistical significance regarding BIC values at 4 and 8 weeks (p
Databáze: OpenAIRE