Oral rapamycin to inhibit restenosis after stenting of de novo coronary lesions
| Autor: | Joseph Lindsay, Chrysoula Pappas, Lowell F. Satler, Ellen Pinnow, Neil J. Weissman, Daniel A. Canos, Rebecca Torguson, Andrew E. Ajani, Ron Waksman, Augusto D. Pichard, Maureen C Abbott, Pramod K. Kuchulakanti, Louise Gambone, Kenneth M. Kent |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2004 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Urology Stent medicine.disease Loading dose Coronary artery disease Restenosis Oral administration Internal medicine Sirolimus Intravascular ultrasound medicine Cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business medicine.drug Antibacterial agent |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 44:1386-1392 |
| ISSN: | 0735-1097 |
| Popis: | Objectives The aim of this study was to establish safety and feasibility of oral Rapamycin at two doses—2 mg and 5 mg—in achieving low rates of repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) in de novo native coronary artery lesions. Background Drug-eluting stents have shown the ability to limit restenosis. Oral Rapamycin is an alternative strategy that can target multiple coronary lesions suitable for treatment with any approved metal stent and at potentially lower cost. Methods The Oral Rapamune to Inhibit Restenosis (ORBIT) study is an open-label study of 60 patients with de novo lesions treated with bare metal stents in up to two vessels. After a loading dose of 5 mg, patients received a daily dose of 2 mg (n = 30) and 5 mg (n = 30) for 30 days. Six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and clinical follow-up were conducted. Results Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar: 10% of patients in the 2-mg group and 30% in the 5-mg group did not complete the course; 43% in the 2-mg group and 66% in the 5-mg group had side effects. At six-month follow-up, late loss (0.6 ± 0.5 mm vs. 0.7 ± 0.5 mm; p = NS), in-stent binary restenosis (7.1% vs. 6.9%; p = NS), in-stent percent volume obstruction by IVUS (29% vs. 24%; p = NS), and clinically driven TLR (14.3% vs. 6.9%; p = NS) were similar in 2-mg and 5-mg groups. Conclusions Oral Rapamycin for the prevention of restenosis is safe, feasible, and associated with low rates of repeat revascularization. Although associated with certain side effects, it may be considered for patients undergoing multivessel stents if proven in larger randomized studies. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|