House dust mite sublingual tablet is effective and safe in patients with allergic rhinitis
Autor: | Y Yoshida, Yoshitaka Okamoto, Shigeharu Fujieda, Mitsuhiro Okano, Shinji Kakudo, Keisuke Masuyama |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Male
0301 basic medicine medicine.disease_cause Average Adjusted Symptom Score 0302 clinical medicine Allergen Japan Clinical endpoint Immunology and Allergy Child house dust mite biology Pyroglyphidae Middle Aged Treatment Outcome Experimental Allergy and Immunology sublingual immunotherapy tablet Original Article Female Onset of action Tablets Adult medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Immunology Placebo Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences Internal medicine medicine Animals Humans Adverse effect Asthma House dust mite Sublingual Immunotherapy allergic rhinitis business.industry clinical study Allergens Immunoglobulin E biology.organism_classification medicine.disease Rhinitis Allergic Surgery 030104 developmental biology 030228 respiratory system Immunoglobulin G ORIGINAL ARTICLES business |
Zdroj: | Allergy |
ISSN: | 0105-4538 |
DOI: | 10.1111/all.12996 |
Popis: | Background House dust mite (HDM) is the major indoor allergen for allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. Although sublingual immunotherapy is a curative treatment for HDM-induced AR, data from large-scale studies are limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of HDM tablets in adolescent and adult patients (aged 12–64 years) with HDM-induced AR with or without intermittent asthma. Methods In a double-blind trial in Japan, 968 subjects were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to 300 index of reactivity (IR), 500 IR, or placebo groups. The primary endpoint was the Average Adjusted Symptom Score (AASS) in the last eight weeks of the 52-week treatment. Secondary endpoints included individual nasal and ocular symptom scores, rescue medication use, and the Japanese Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JRQLQ) scores. Results The AASS in the last eight weeks of treatment significantly improved in both the 300 IR and the 500 IR groups compared to that in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In the 300 IR group, the onset of action occurred at week 8–10. All four nasal symptoms significantly improved in both active treatment groups; rescue medication use and JRQLQ outcome improved in the 300 IR group. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild, and 16 serious AEs (SAEs) were reported; however, none of them were drug-related. Conclusions One-year treatment with 300 IR and 500 IR HDM tablets was effective without major safety concerns. The recommended therapeutic dose for AR is 300 IR. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |