Controlling protein surface orientation by strategic placement of oligo-histidine tags

Autor: Christian Blum, Pierre Andre Cazade, Shane O'Mahony, Pascal Jonkheijm, Jord C. Prangsma, Jurriaan Huskens, Jordi Cabanas-Danés, Damien Thompson, Vinod Subramaniam, Eldrich E. Tromp, Dorothee Wasserberg
Přispěvatelé: German Academic Exchange Service, Stichting Technische Wetenschappen, ERC, SFI, Molecular Nanofabrication, Nanobiophysics, Executive board Vrije Universiteit
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: ACS nano, 11(9), 9068-9083. American Chemical Society
ACS Nano, 11(9), 9068-9083. American Chemical Society
ACS Nano
Wasserberg, D, Cabanas-Danés, J, Prangsma, J, O'Mahony, S, Cazade, P A, Tromp, E, Blum, C, Thompson, D, Huskens, J, Subramaniam, V & Jonkheijm, P 2017, ' Controlling Protein Surface Orientation by Strategic Placement of Oligo-Histidine Tags ', ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 9068-9083 . https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03717
ISSN: 1936-0851
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03717
Popis: We report oriented immobilization of proteins using the standard hexahistidine (His6)-Ni2+:NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid) methodology, which we systematically tuned to give control of surface coverage. Fluorescence microscopy and surface plasmon resonance measurements of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of red fluorescent proteins (TagRFP) showed that binding strength increased by 1 order of magnitude for each additional His6-tag on the TagRFP proteins. All TagRFP variants with His6-tags located on only one side of the barrel-shaped protein yielded a 1.5 times higher surface coverage compared to variants with His6-tags on opposite sides of the so-called β-barrel. Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy measurements supported by polarized infrared spectroscopy verified that the orientation (and thus coverage and functionality) of proteins on surfaces can be controlled by strategic placement of a His6-tag on the protein. Molecular dynamics simulations show how the differently tagged proteins reside at the surface in "end-on" and "side-on" orientations with each His6-tag contributing to binding. Also, not every dihistidine subunit in a given His6-tag forms a full coordination bond with the Ni2+:NTA SAMs, which varied with the position of the His6-tag on the protein. At equal valency but different tag positions on the protein, differences in binding were caused by probing for Ni2+:NTA moieties and by additional electrostatic interactions between different fractions of the β-barrel structure and charged NTA moieties. Potential of mean force calculations indicate there is no specific single-protein interaction mode that provides a clear preferential surface orientation, suggesting that the experimentally measured preference for the end-on orientation is a supra-protein, not a single-protein, effect.
Databáze: OpenAIRE