The outcome of bifurcation lesion stenting using a biolimus-eluting stent with a bio-degradable polymer compared to a sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer

Autor: Bernhard Meier, Ton de Vries, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Pedro Eerdmans, Peter Jüni, Carlo Di Mario, Stanislaw Trznadel, Karsten Lenk, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Paweł Buszman, Stephan Windecker, Paweł Tyczyński, Gerrit-Anne van Es, Volker Klauss, Franz R. Eberli, Thomas Ischinger, Roberto Corti, Scot Garg, Marie-Claude Morice, Axel Linke, Patrick W. Serruys, William Wijns
Přispěvatelé: Cardiology, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University of Zurich
Rok vydání: 2011
Předmět:
Zdroj: EuroIntervention, 6(8), 928-935. EuroPCR
Garg, Scot; Wykrzykowska, Joanna; Serruys, Patrick W; de Vries, Ton; Buszman, Pawel; Trznadel, Stanislaw; Linke, Axel; Lenk, Karsten; Ischinger, Thomas; Klauss, Volker; Eberli, Franz; Corti, Roberto; Wijns, William; Morice, Marie-Claude; di Mario, Carlo; Tyczynski, Pawel; van Geuns, Robert Jan; Eerdmans, Pedro; van Es, Gerrit-Anne; Meier, Bernhard; ... (2011). The outcome of bifurcation lesion stenting using a biolimus-eluting stent with a bio-degradable polymer compared to a sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer. EuroIntervention, 6(8), pp. 928-935. Toulouse: Europa Digital & Publishing
ISSN: 1774-024X
Popis: Aims: This study investigated the differences in clinical outcomes between patients with bifurcation lesions (BL) treated with a biolimus-eluting stent (BES) with a biodegradable polymer, and a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with a durable polymer. Methods and results: The clinical outcomes were assessed in the 497 patients (BES 258, SES 239) enrolled in the multicentre, randomised LEADERS trial who underwent treatment of Y1 BL (total=534 BL). At 12-months follow-up there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of MACE, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation (BES 12.8% vs. SES 16.3%, p=0.31). Patients treated with BES had comparable rates of cardiac death (BES 2.7% vs. SES 2.9%, p=1.00), numerically higher rates of myocardial infarction (BES 8.9% vs. SES 5.4%, p=0.17), and significantly lower rates of clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation (4.3% vs. 11.3%, p=0.004) when compared to those treated with SES. The rate of stent thrombosis at 12-months was 4.3% and 3.8% for BES and SES, respectively (p=0.82). Conclusions: In the treatment of BL the use of BES lead to superior efficacy and comparable safety compared to SES. © Europa Edition 2011. All rights reserved.
Databáze: OpenAIRE