Measurement invariance tests of revisions to archaically worded items in the Mach IV scale
Autor: | Kay M. Nicols, Brian K. Miller, Robert Konopaske |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
Psychometrics Economics Social Sciences 050109 social psychology Mathematical and Statistical Techniques Statistics Psychology Equivalence (measure theory) Mathematics Language Principal Component Analysis Multidisciplinary Covariance 05 social sciences Confirmatory factor analysis Exploratory factor analysis Physical Sciences Medicine Female Factor Analysis Research Article Personality Adult Employment Adolescent Sample (material) Science Research and Analysis Methods Skewness 050105 experimental psychology Young Adult Humans Machiavellianism 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Measurement invariance Statistical Methods Statistical hypothesis testing Factor analysis Cognitive Psychology Biology and Life Sciences Random Variables Models Theoretical Probability Theory Probability Distribution Labor Economics Multivariate Analysis Cognitive Science Factor Analysis Statistical Neuroscience |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 10, p e0223504 (2019) |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | The Machiavellian IV [1] instrument, developed almost 50 years ago to measure trait Machiavellianism and still in wide use in personality research, uses item wording that is not gender-neutral, makes use of idiomatic expressions, and includes archaic references. In this two-sample study, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on one sample to examine the structure of responses to the Mach IV. In an independent second sample the resulting EFA structure was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis-based measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) tests in a control group with the original archaic items and a treatment group with eight items rewritten in a more modern vernacular. Specific model testing steps [2] and statistical tests [3] were applied in a bottom-up approach [4] to ME/I tests on these two versions of the Mach IV. The two versions were found to have equal form, equal factor loadings, but unequal indicator error variances. Subsequent item-by-item tests of error invariance resulted in substantial decrements to fit for three revised items suggesting that the error associated with these items was not equal across the two versions. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |