Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas for segmented multifocal intraocular lens
| Autor: | Xiaotong Han, Huanhuan Cheng, Mingxing Wu, Yu Liu, Jianbing Li, Liangping Liu, Jing Zhao |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment Emmetropia Intraocular lens law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine lcsh:Ophthalmology Clinical Research law Ophthalmology medicine Manifest refraction lens constants accuracy business.industry intraocular lens formulas Phacoemulsification Multifocal intraocular lens Lens (optics) segmented multifocal intraocular lens lcsh:RE1-994 030221 ophthalmology & optometry Intraocular lens power calculation business |
| Zdroj: | Int J Ophthalmol International Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol 13, Iss 9, Pp 1378-1384 (2020) |
| ISSN: | 2227-4898 2222-3959 |
| Popis: | AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of eight different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for a segmented multifocal IOL. METHODS: A total of 53 eyes of 41 adult cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with the SBL-3 segmented multifocal IOL between January 1, 2017 and January 31, 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative biometry measurements were obtained using an IOL Master. Manifest refraction was performed at least 4wk postoperatively. Accuracy of the eight formulas [Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T] was analyzed. RESULTS: Using current lens constants, all formulas exhibited errors of slight myopic shift in refractive prediction. The Barrett Universal II formula had a significantly lower median absolute error (MedAE) than did Holladay 1 (P=0.02), Kane (P=0.001) and Hill-RBF 2.0 (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|