Critical analysis of the topology and rooting of the parabasalian 16S rRNA tree
| Autor: | Jan Tachezy, Vladimír Hampl, Ivan Čepička, Jaroslav Flegr, Jaroslav Kulda |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2005 |
| Předmět: |
Molecular Sequence Data
Biology Microbiology Evolution Molecular Tree (descriptive set theory) Monocercomonadidae Phylogenetics RNA Ribosomal 16S Polyphyly Botany Genetics Animals Molecular Biology Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics Phylogeny Topology (chemistry) Long branch attraction Organelles Likelihood Functions Base Sequence Models Genetic Phylum Eukaryota Bayes Theorem Sequence Analysis DNA 16S ribosomal RNA Anagenesis Order (biology) Evolutionary biology |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 52:35S-38S |
| ISSN: | 1550-7408 1066-5234 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_5_9.x |
| Popis: | The morphological classification of the protozoan phylum Parabasala is not in absolute agreement with the 16S rRNA phylogeny. However, there are strong indications that tree-construction artifacts play a considerable role in the shaping of the 16S rRNA tree. We have performed rigorous analyses designed to minimize such artifacts using the slow–fast and taxa-exclusion methods. The analyses, which included new sequences from the genera Monocercomonas and Hexamastix, in most respects confirmed the previously suggested tree topology and polyphyly of Hypermastigida and Monocercomonadidae but detected one artificial cluster of long branches (Trichonymphidae, Pseudotrichonymphidae, Hexamastix, and Tricercomitus). They also indicated that the rooting of the phylum on the trichonymphid branch is probably wrong and that reliable rooting on the basis of current data is likely impossible. We discuss the tree topology in the view of anagenesis of cytoskeletal and motility organelles and suggest that a robust taxonomic revision requires extensive analysis of other gene sequences. 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text