Relationship between Verbal and Nonverbal Tests of Auditory Temporal Processing
| Autor: | Jay R. Lucker, Marni L. Novick |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Test battery
medicine.medical_specialty Exploratory research Audiology 01 natural sciences Correlation 03 medical and health sciences Speech and Hearing symbols.namesake Nonverbal communication 0302 clinical medicine 0103 physical sciences medicine Humans 030223 otorhinolaryngology 010301 acoustics Data collection Data Collection Hearing Tests Gap detection Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Test (assessment) Time Perception symbols Auditory Perception Psychology Noise |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 32(5) |
| ISSN: | 2157-3107 |
| Popis: | Background Audiologists may choose to evaluate auditory temporal processing in assessing auditory processing abilities. Some may decide to use measures of nonverbal stimuli such as tonal or noise gap detection. Others may decide to use verbal measures such as time compressed sentences (TCS). Many may choose to use both. Purpose Since people typically come to audiologists for auditory processing testing complaining of problems processing verbal stimuli, the question arises whether measures of nonverbal stimuli provide evidence regarding a person's abilities to processing verbal stimuli. That is, are there significant correlations between measures of verbal stimuli and nonverbal stimuli that are used to evaluate auditory temporal processing? Research Design The present investigation is an exploratory study using file review of 104 people seen for routine auditory processing evaluations by the authors. Study Sample A file review was completed based on data from 104 people seen for auditory processing evaluations. Data Collection and Analyses The data from these 104 files were used to evaluate whether there are any correlations between verbal and nonverbal measures of auditory temporal processing. The verbal measure used was the TCS subtest of the SCAN-3 while the nonverbal measures included the gap detection screening from the SCAN-3 as well as the gaps-in-noise measures. Results from these tests were compared to determine whether any significant correlations were found based on results from Pearson product moment correlational analyses. Results None of the nonverbal measures were found to have a significant correlation with the TCS test findings based on the Pearson correlations used to analyze the data. Conclusion Results indicate that there are no significant correlations (relationships) between measures of auditory temporal processing using nonverbal stimuli versus verbal stimuli based on the tests used in the present investigation. These findings lead to a conclusion that tests using nonverbal stimuli are measuring different auditory processes than the measure of verbal stimuli used in the present investigation. Since people typically come complaining about understanding verbal input, it is concluded that audiologists should use some verbal measure of auditory temporal processing in their auditory processing test battery. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|