Supporting innovation in health care: A short experience in a dedicated unit of the French Ministry of Public Health
| Autor: | Jacques Belghiti, C. Oget-Gendre, A.-F. Berthon, J.Y. Fagon |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Delegation business.industry Compensation (psychology) media_common.quotation_subject Public health Specialty General Medicine Public relations Solidarity Unit (housing) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Health care Humans Medicine 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Christian ministry France Health Facilities Public Health business Delivery of Health Care media_common |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Visceral Surgery. 158:S6-S11 |
| ISSN: | 1878-7886 |
| Popis: | Summary Introduction The Delegation for Innovation in Health Care (DIES) was created by the Ministry of Solidarity and Health to centralize and support innovative health care projects. Following its dissolution, only two and a half years after its creation, the members of this delegation aimed to present the projects, which were submitted and treated by the DIES. Methods All potential project leaders were free to explain the objectives of their project to our team. These projects were then classified according to their objective, their type, the medical specialty concerned, the target population and their purpose. The DIES graded the degree of innovation, advised on the need for complementary scientific evaluation and oriented the personnel in charge towards fitting financing structures. Results Between April 2016 and December 2018, the DIES received 269 potential project leaders, almost exclusively from the national territory of France, focused on diversified medical specialties with a slight predilection for chronic diseases and disabilities. The projects were often at an economically tenuous stage of development. Less than 5% of the projects concerned drug therapy. More than a third involved medical devices, including “surgical” projects (predominately orthopedics), disability compensation methodology, vascular problems and bandages. E-health, the organization of care, and a “non-classifiable” category that included wellness projects each represented 20% of the projects. Almost 80% of these projects had some electronically (e-) based mechanism. Only 15% of all projects had the ambition to meet an unmet or poorly covered need. Only about a third of the project leaders presented a clinical or medico-economic evaluation with sufficiently rigorous methodology to assess the achievement of their objectives. Conclusion Innovative health projects are dominated by the search for improvement in the organization of the health care system and the care pathway with e-connected applications. Evaluation of the vast majority of these projects is very difficult and this situation reinforces the idea that these requests should be centralized to improve support for promoters of innovation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect