Equity-Efficiency Trade-offs Associated With Alternative Approaches to Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: A Patient-level Simulation

Autor: Bernadette Li, Rachel J. Johnson, John Cairns, Christopher J.E. Watson, Christopher Dudley, John L. R. Forsythe, Gabriel C Oniscu, Rommel Ravanan, Heather Draper, Paul Roderick, J. Andrew Bradley, Wendy Metcalfe, Charles R.V. Tomson
Přispěvatelé: Watson, Christopher [0000-0002-0590-4901], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
Adolescent
Waiting Lists
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Health Status
030230 surgery
Risk Assessment
Health Services Accessibility
Donor Selection
03 medical and health sciences
Young Adult
0302 clinical medicine
Older patients
Risk Factors
medicine
Humans
Computer Simulation
Healthcare Disparities
Intensive care medicine
Patient simulation
Policy Making
Deceased donor kidney
Transplantation
Deceased donor
Equity (economics)
Health Care Rationing
business.industry
Trade offs
Age Factors
Health Care Costs
Original Clinical Science—General
Middle Aged
Kidney Transplantation
Tissue Donors
United States
Kidney allocation
Treatment Outcome
ComputingMethodologies_DOCUMENTANDTEXTPROCESSING
Quality of Life
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Female
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
business
Zdroj: Transplantation
ISSN: 0041-1337
DOI: 10.17863/cam.44300
Popis: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
Background. The number of patients waiting to receive a kidney transplant outstrips the supply of donor organs. We sought to quantify trade-offs associated with different approaches to deceased donor kidney allocation in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and access to transplantation. Methods. An individual patient simulation model was developed to compare 5 different approaches to kidney allocation, including the 2006 UK National Kidney Allocation Scheme (NKAS) and a QALY maximization approach designed to maximize health gains from a limited supply of donor organs. We used various sources of patient-level data to develop multivariable regression models to predict survival, health state utilities, and costs. We simulated the allocation of kidneys from 2200 deceased donors to a waiting list of 5500 patients and produced estimates of total lifetime costs and QALYs for each allocation scheme. Results. Among patients who received a transplant, the QALY maximization approach generated 48 045 QALYs and cost £681 million, while the 2006 NKAS generated 44 040 QALYs and cost £625 million. When also taking into consideration outcomes for patients who were not prioritized to receive a transplant, the 2006 NKAS produced higher total QALYs and costs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £110 741/QALY compared with the QALY maximization approach. Conclusions. Compared with the 2006 NKAS, a QALY maximization approach makes more efficient use of deceased donor kidneys but reduces access to transplantation for older patients and results in greater inequity in the distribution of health gains between patients who receive a transplant and patients who remain on the waiting list.
Databáze: OpenAIRE