A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative dynamic models of biological regulatory networks
Autor: | Réka Albert, Assieh Saadatpour |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Mathematical optimization Theoretical computer science Differential equation Piecewise affine differential equations models Hill-type models Systems biology Boolean models Complex system Fixed point Class (biology) lcsh:RC321-571 Dynamic models Network motifs 03 medical and health sciences 030104 developmental biology 0302 clinical medicine lcsh:Biology (General) Asynchronous communication Biological regulatory networks Attractor lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry lcsh:QH301-705.5 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Mathematics |
Zdroj: | EPJ Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, Vol 4, Iss 1, p 5 (2016) |
ISSN: | 2195-0008 |
DOI: | 10.1140/epjnbp/s40366-016-0031-y |
Popis: | Background Mathematical modeling of biological regulatory networks provides valuable insights into the structural and dynamical properties of the underlying systems. While dynamic models based on differential equations provide quantitative information on the biological systems, qualitative models that rely on the logical interactions among the components provide coarse-grained descriptions useful for systems whose mechanistic underpinnings remain incompletely understood. The middle ground class of piecewise affine differential equation models was proven informative for systems with partial knowledge of kinetic parameters. Methods In this work we provide a comparison of the dynamic characteristics of these three approaches applied on several biological regulatory network motifs. Specifically, we compare the attractors and state transitions in asynchronous Boolean, piecewise affine and Hill-type continuous models. Results Our study shows that while the fixed points of asynchronous Boolean models are observed in continuous Hill-type and piecewise affine models, these models may exhibit different attractors under certain conditions. Conclusions Overall, qualitative models are suitable for systems with limited knowledge of quantitative information. On the other hand, when practical, using quantitative models can provide detailed information about additional real-valued attractors not present in the qualitative models. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |