Autor: |
Ana K. Spalding, Tracy D. Ainsworth, Sarah W. Davies, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Hollie M. Putnam, Hanny E. Rivera, Amanda E. Bates, Laura M. Parker, Nikki Traylor-Knowles, Sarah C. Crosby, Rachel M. Wright, Brooke L. Weigel, Isabelle M. Côté, Anna Metaxas, Nyssa J. Silbiger, Anne Duplouy, Colleen B. Bove, Adriana Humanes, Alyssa Griffin, Robinson W. Fulweiler, Torrance C. Hanley, Julia K. Baum, Tessa M. Hill, Nicola S. Smith |
Přispěvatelé: |
Insect Symbiosis Ecology and Evolution, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme |
Rok vydání: |
2021 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
PLoS biology, vol 19, iss 6 PLoS Biology, Vol 19, Iss 6, p e3001282 (2021) PLoS Biology |
Popis: |
Success and impact metrics in science are based on a system that perpetuates sexist and racist “rewards” by prioritizing citations and impact factors. These metrics are flawed and biased against already marginalized groups and fail to accurately capture the breadth of individuals’ meaningful scientific impacts. We advocate shifting this outdated value system to advance science through principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. We outline pathways for a paradigm shift in scientific values based on multidimensional mentorship and promoting mentee well-being. These actions will require collective efforts supported by academic leaders and administrators to drive essential systemic change. This Essay argues that success and impact metrics in science are based on a system that perpetuates sexist and racist ‘rewards’ by prioritizing citations and impact factors; the authors advocate shifting this outdated value system to advance science through principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|