Simultaneous Radiological and Fiberendoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing ('SIRFES') in Patients After Surgery of Oropharyngeal/Laryngeal Cancer and Postoperative Dysphagia
Autor: | I. Roesner, Michael Weber, Peter Pokieser, Martina Scharitzer, D. M. Denk-Linnert |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty 030507 speech-language pathology & audiology 03 medical and health sciences Speech and Hearing Postoperative Complications 0302 clinical medicine Bolus (medicine) Swallowing Humans Medicine Prospective Studies Prospective cohort study Laryngeal Neoplasms Aged Aged 80 and over medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Cineradiography Gastroenterology Endoscopy Middle Aged Dysphagia Deglutition disorders Confidence interval Deglutition Surgery Oropharyngeal Neoplasms Pharyngeal Neoplasm Otorhinolaryngology Respiratory aspiration Fluoroscopy Original Article Female Esophagoscopy medicine.symptom 0305 other medical science business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Pharyngeal neoplasms |
Zdroj: | Dysphagia |
ISSN: | 1432-0460 0179-051X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00455-019-09979-8 |
Popis: | To compare the results of a simultaneously performed videofluoroscopic swallowing study and fiberendoscopic evaluation of swallowing in patients with dysphagia after surgery and radiotherapy for oropharyngeal or laryngeal cancer. This prospective study included 31 patients who were examined simultaneously with a standardized protocol. The fiberendoscopic and videofluoroscopic swallowing loops were independently scored by two otorhinolaryngologists/phoniatricians and two radiologists. The presence of penetration/aspiration, the amount of pharyngeal residues and the position of the bolus head when triggering of pharyngeal swallow begins were evaluated. Generalized linear models were used to model the impact of rater, method, bolus and quantities as well as specified moderation effects on scorings. In addition, post hoc Wilcoxon tests were used. Rater agreement was assessed using weighted kappas and their 95% confidence intervals. A total of 202 swallow sequences in 29 patients was evaluated. Interrater agreement was substantial to excellent for both methods (weighted k = 0.979–0.613). Significant differences between both methods were found when assessing the penetration-aspiration scale (p = 0.001, tendency of higher scores by videofluoroscopic (median = 2.59) as opposed to fiberendoscopic (median = 2.14) and the residue severity scores in the valleculae (p = 0.029) and the sinus piriformes (p = 0.002) with larger residues scored by fiberendoscopic evaluation of swallowing. No significant differences were found regarding the time point of triggering (p = 0.273). Simultaneous evaluation of swallowing with FEES and VFSS showed significantly different results in symptomatic patients after tumor operation and radiotherapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00455-019-09979-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |