| Autor: |
A Chepurnoy, E Gitelzon, Z Shugushev, J M Bolivougui, S. V. Volkov, D A Maximkin, A. G. Faybushevich, A Korobkov |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Web of Science |
| Popis: |
Aims A comparative analysis and evaluate the effectiveness and prognostic value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) guiding measurement in patients with stenosis of the terminal part of the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Methods 222 patients were selected in the study. Inclusion criteria: true bifurcation stenosis of the LMCA according to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and classification by A. Medina. Criteria for determining the hemodynamic significance of stenosis: according OCT - minimal lumen area (MLA) in the terminal part of LMCA Results The OCT was performed in 110 patients and FFR guiding measurement – in 112 patients. According to the OCT, were hemodynamically significant stenoses are determined in 36 (32.7%) patients and after FFR-guiding measurement – in 32 (28.6%) of patients (χ2=2.184 p>0.05). Patients without hemodynamically significant stenoses distributed into 2 groups: group 1 (n=74) – according to the OCT and group 2 (n=80) – according to the FFR. The long-term results were monitored in all patients. The frequency of myocardial infarction in group 1 were 1.4% and in group 2 – 7.5% (p Conclusions The effectiveness of the OCT imaging and the FFR-guiding measurement in determining the hemodynamic significance of the bifurcation stenosis of the LMCA, not different. However, in the long term period, patients with insignificant stenosis identified by the FFR, have a worse prognosis and are distinguished by a major cardiac events, compared with the OCT, which does not allow us to recommend the FFR method as the main one for determining the hemodynamic significance of LMCA. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Russian academic excellence project 5-100 |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
