Patterns of incident dementia codes during the COVID‐19 pandemic at an integrated healthcare system
| Autor: | Aiyu Chen, Susan E Wang, Huong Q. Nguyen, Soo Borson |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Gerontology
Male telehealth Telehealth dementia diagnosis California COVID‐19‐Related Content Alzheimer Disease International Classification of Diseases medicine Dementia Humans Medical diagnosis Pandemics Aged Quality of Health Care Retrospective Studies Skilled Nursing Facilities business.industry Delivery of Health Care Integrated SARS-CoV-2 Incidence (epidemiology) Telecare Brief Report Incidence COVID-19 Retrospective cohort study Emergency department incident ADRD codes medicine.disease United States Female Diagnosis code Geriatrics and Gerontology business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society |
| ISSN: | 1532-5415 0002-8614 |
| Popis: | Background The COVID‐19 pandemic delayed diagnosis and care for some acute conditions and reduced monitoring for some chronic conditions. It is unclear whether new diagnoses of chronic conditions such as dementia were also affected. We compared the pattern of incident Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) diagnosis codes from 2017 to 2019 through 2020, the first pandemic year. Methods Retrospective cohort design, leveraging 2015–2020 data on all members 65 years and older with no prior ADRD diagnosis, enrolled in a large integrated healthcare system for at least 2 years. Incident ADRD was defined as the first ICD‐10 code at any encounter, including outpatient (face‐to‐face, video, or phone), hospital (emergency department, observation, or inpatient), or continuing care (home, skilled nursing facility, and long‐term care). We also examined incident ADRD codes and use of telehealth by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and spoken language. Results Compared to overall annual incidence rates for ADRD codes in 2017–2019, 2020 incidence was slightly lower (1.30% vs. 1.40%), partially compensating later in the year for reduced rates during the early months of the pandemic. No racial or ethnic group differences were identified. Telehealth ADRD codes increased fourfold, making up for a 39% drop from face‐to‐face outpatient encounters. Older age (85+) was associated with higher odds of receiving telecare versus face‐to‐face care in 2020 (OR:1.50, 95%CI: 1.25–1.80) and a slightly lower incidence of new codes; no racial/ethnic, sex, or language differences were identified in the mode of care. Conclusions Rates of incident ADRD codes dropped early in the first pandemic year but rose again to near pre‐pandemic rates for the year as a whole, as clinicians rapidly pivoted to telehealth. With refinement of protocols for remote dementia detection and diagnosis, health systems could improve access to equitable detection and diagnosis of ADRD going forward. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text